Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<87cyj5xpao.fsf@jemoni.to> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@jemoni.to> Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer,comp.misc,comp.unix.bsd.freebsd.misc Subject: Re: big thanks to Followup-To: comp.misc Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 20:45:51 -0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 13 Message-ID: <87cyj5xpao.fsf@jemoni.to> References: <87a5e93j1v.fsf@jemoni.to> <vglv3q$3bsio$4@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 00:46:03 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1bf8505bfe380987e2cf5b5206c6b9a3"; logging-data="3591036"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19ycPedVaQWyj1xIhhuFviDyY90goyGYNM=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:3YOd9xLSOKmMnCWMI4qM3S54/X4= sha1:GsT08Vn28RZ2mXrXJhOxczuc/nc= Bytes: 1487 Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes: D> On Fri, 08 Nov 2024 11:18:52 -0300, Wolfgang Agnes wrote: > >> (*) inetd and xinetd >> >> I did look at the current state of affairs of inetd and xinetd and it >> looks like they ignore TLS completely. Perhaps they shouldn't? > > If you look at the tlswrapper docs, you’ll see that it can be invoked via > inetd (or systemd), and it in turn wraps the actual service process. That makes sense.