| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<87ed8jnbmf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Baby X is bor nagain Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 13:15:36 +0100 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 25 Message-ID: <87ed8jnbmf.fsf@bsb.me.uk> References: <v494f9$von8$1@dont-email.me> <v53i4s$33k73$2@dont-email.me> <v53lf7$34huc$1@dont-email.me> <v53vh6$368vf$1@dont-email.me> <v54se1$3bqsk$1@dont-email.me> <20240624160941.0000646a@yahoo.com> <v5bu5r$va3a$1@dont-email.me> <20240624181006.00003b94@yahoo.com> <v5c86d$11ac7$1@dont-email.me> <JEheO.108086$ED9b.74955@fx11.iad> <v5cblg$11q0j$1@dont-email.me> <gEieO.108089$ED9b.25598@fx11.iad> <20240625113616.000075e0@yahoo.com> <mUzeO.141609$Cqra.55051@fx10.iad> <v5elql$1jmii$1@dont-email.me> <m3BeO.24907$Gurd.16179@fx34.iad> <v5empd$1jndv$2@dont-email.me> <v5eph4$1k6a9$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2024 14:15:37 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="35d100b08aeb39b413b37a8f4b1865ac"; logging-data="2245339"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+r73MAaI6sWdXGxRso0EN7lijLyq9N+fQ=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cancel-Lock: sha1:TuUerFVcRtjsGiygh4svrmKODOg= sha1:yzMx+Qi+CHM+Lg9qpWPy44geYac= X-BSB-Auth: 1.d44084e324fc1b177758.20240626131536BST.87ed8jnbmf.fsf@bsb.me.uk Bytes: 2645 bart <bc@freeuk.com> writes: > On 25/06/2024 16:12, David Brown wrote: .... >> I /do/ use Python. I use it when it is an appropriate language to use, >> which is very different circumstances from when I use C (or >> C++). Different tools for different tasks. > > And yet neither of you are interested in answering my question, which was > why its simplistic bytecode compiler is acceptable in this scenario, but > would be considered useless if applied to C code. You throw out a lot of these sorts of question, by which I mean questions that you either /do/ know the answers to or which you /should/ know the answers to. If a software engineering student asked me this sort of "challenge" question it would immediately become homework: come up with at least two scenarios in which a simplistic C bytecode compiler would be an unacceptable tool to use, and two in which Python with a trivial bytecode compiler would be an acceptable tool to use. In each case explain why. Anyone who could not would get marked down on the course. -- Ben.