Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<87h6cxx2sw.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: technology discussion =?utf-8?Q?=E2=86=92?= does the world need
 a "new" C ?
Date: Tue, 09 Jul 2024 21:56:47 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 24
Message-ID: <87h6cxx2sw.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <v66eci$2qeee$1@dont-email.me> <v67gt1$2vq6a$2@dont-email.me>
	<v687h2$36i6p$1@dont-email.me>
	<871q48w98e.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<v68dsm$37sg2$1@dont-email.me>
	<87wmlzvfqp.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<v6ard1$3ngh6$4@dont-email.me> <v6b0jv$3nnt6$1@dont-email.me>
	<87h6d2uox5.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<v6l2o7$1p1a5$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 06:56:48 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2ff96a67704e58776cf4f9c1dffac965";
	logging-data="1871674"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19k1rPmdXoR8hM+VzTFd+eH"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:xQYrCmbGwnLpIlNfa/wnqiJEK4o=
	sha1:dtE5aEL2J1EtUJeFYbRGynZ5CmA=
Bytes: 2186

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
> On Sat, 06 Jul 2024 15:38:14 -0700, Keith Thompson wrote:
>
>> BGB <cr88192@gmail.com> writes:
>>
>>> ... in the 1D case, an array can be seen as functionally an
>>> implicitly defined pointer ...
>> 
>> No, there is no implicitly defined pointer.
>>
>> ...
>> 
>> If you evaluate the expression `array_object` in most contexts, it's
>> implicitly converted to a pointer *value*, pointing to the 0th element
>> of the array object.  There is still no implicit pointer object.
>
> The OP said “pointer”, not “pointer object” or “pointer value”. Not sure 
> what hair you are trying to split here.

Not sure what was unclear.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */