Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Should comp.lang.c.moderated be revived?
Date: Tue, 11 Mar 2025 23:24:16 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 14
Message-ID: <87ikoe9373.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <87h640gvyr.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<86h63yub2r.fsf@linuxsc.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 07:24:20 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2ee0643898249dbfd259d9c8db55be3c";
	logging-data="2611053"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Txz4T/v+ptnEbU4EvTN01"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:+r3boiQyvyDGeHmz34kwEnvDa4Q=
	sha1:HE6SL63PeBSUo6rDqGKsEG6fwXI=
Bytes: 1482

Tim Rentsch <tr.17687@z991.linuxsc.com> writes:
[...]
> I am in favor of reviving comp.lang.c.moderated, and hope a
> suitable moderating arrangement can be found.
>
> Technical question:  is it feasible to have moderating duties
> be shared among several people on some sort of rotating basis?
> I have no experience moderating a usenet news group.

I'm fairly sure it is.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */