| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<87jz43fgrf.fsf@enoch.nodomain.nowhere> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: nntp.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> Newsgroups: misc.news.internet.discuss Subject: Re: Is it okay to boil water more than once Date: 20 Jul 2025 04:44:36 -0300 Organization: Bridgewater Institute for Advanced Study - Blacksmith Shop Lines: 20 Sender: mds@enoch.nodomain.nowhere Message-ID: <87jz43fgrf.fsf@enoch.nodomain.nowhere> References: <105dton$25kon$1@dont-email.me> <687bd284$0$19$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <105gl3m$2gd3n$2@dont-email.me> Injection-Date: Sun, 20 Jul 2025 09:44:37 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="14f1e19dc331f1af1139991ffbc70387"; logging-data="3424000"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19g/jwcRcJ7am6x4IsjkNr86q4e8Tc9g4Q=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:348GFjmhrV2pB20L5PGExqUR9ek= X-Clacks-Overhead: 4GH GNU Terry Pratchett X-Newsreader: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7 JAB <here@is.invalid> writes: > While the concentration of inorganic compounds might increase as > drinking water evaporates when boiled, evidence shows it doesn't > happen to such an extent that it would be hazardous." The exception might be the household that leaves a tea ketle on the wood range 24/7, adding water as it steams or boils away. Normally 50% or more of that water would be used daily but if refilled repeatedly for days without using much or any, you could get (estimating here) a 10:1 concentration of anything non-volatile and non-heat labile. Any potential risk would depend on pre-existing borderline levels of heavy metals or very stable organics in the water source. There's no risk from using "previously boiled" water. -- Mike Spencer Nova Scotia, Canada