| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<87jzczmk8v.fsf@example.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Wolfgang Agnes <wagnes@example.com> Newsgroups: comp.mail.sendmail Subject: Re: adding CA certificates (for use by sendmail) Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 10:22:08 -0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: <87jzczmk8v.fsf@example.com> References: <87ttcbly3k.fsf@example.com> <vh18n8$oeh$1@tncsrv09.home.tnetconsulting.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Tue, 19 Nov 2024 14:22:09 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="50ef7b8e27254b139067d796c40a8a89"; logging-data="1958227"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+NvBnHNlThCUW1bXS7LDmxbYi6K2rEngQ=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:QLO2jYfHo+xt1UNQ2bvvL1Tg5Ig= sha1:qBYdfzu6vMv3zjreN+aBJAQNFiU= Bytes: 1717 Grant Taylor <gtaylor@tnetconsulting.net> writes: > On 11/12/24 19:30, Wolfgang Agnes wrote: >> It's not easy to decide where I should ask a FreeBSD group or >> sendmail one. I'm posting to both, but suggesting a follow-up-to >> comp.mail.sendmail. > > I get why you chose comp.mail.sendmail. But my take on this is that > it's more of an OS (lack of certs) issue than it is a Sendmail > (configuration) issue. But both work for me. Grant! Good to see you here! Didn't know you were fond of sendmail. (You won't know who I am, but we've had USENET-conversations a few times.) Writing this quick note just to say thanks and that I'm still to read it carefully and reply. I extend my thanks to all others in this thread.