Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<87jzeapvyl.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!news.swapon.de!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 16:04:18 +0100 Lines: 16 Message-ID: <87jzeapvyl.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <87edbtz43p.fsf@tudado.org> <0d2cnVzOmbD6f4z7nZ2dnZfqnPudnZ2d@brightview.co.uk> <uusur7$2hm6p$1@dont-email.me> <vdf096$2c9hb$8@dont-email.me> <87a5fdj7f2.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <ve83q2$33dfe$1@dont-email.me> <87wmighu4i.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <slrnvgl9ho.39m.apple.universe@freight.zombinet> <vefvq4$k1s6$1@dont-email.me> <874j5fyc7f.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <veiko9$14grm$1@dont-email.me> <87frozj7fe.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com> <veitt2$15uek$1@dont-email.me> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: individual.net TBf/3wYbBXZSw04Are9UIwglSbiIgSvzfq2ojKl1LvK6cN3nU= Cancel-Lock: sha1:FeVC8JhDzCdRkcfvAFcUu5eNuNA= sha1:N7bYtiID/3i7Jla6Rk6m5+JRARI= sha256:Zy4M5nLVmRkkccMmxQ3Y9rCOknAY4d3zl/JYPNA+BCI= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Bytes: 2066 Muttley@DastartdlyHQ.org writes: > On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 11:38:29 +0100 > Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> boring babbled: >>The simple but flexible OO system, reliable automatic memory management [...] > Then there's the whole 2 stage object creation with the "bless" > nonsense. Hacky. I was planning to write a longer reply but killed it. You're obviously argueing about something you reject for political reasons despite you're not really familiar with it and you even 'argue' like a politician. That is, you stick peiorative labels on stuff you don't like to emphasize how really disagreeable you believe it to be. IMHO, such a method of (pseudo-)discussing anything is completely pointless.