Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<87le3s1k10.fsf@mothra.home> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Radey Shouman <shouman@comcast.net> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Riding after heavy manual labor Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 15:43:23 -0400 Organization: None of the above Lines: 64 Message-ID: <87le3s1k10.fsf@mothra.home> References: <Jl51O.14544$N2J4.4957@fx43.iad> <v22tus$112b0$1@dont-email.me> <Sx91O.142$JW17.90@fx12.iad> <v23r8c$1b4fo$1@dont-email.me> <GCl1O.5$XFC9.1@fx06.ams4> <afp1O.2$iJZe.1@fx44.iad> <mlgc4j59jett3eptn4918o63ccs1iti9c9@4ax.com> <v2kr3q$nc4p$2@dont-email.me> <40775j9866udi2dvonrq03bcpum5o8q3t0@4ax.com> <Zu75O.71697$vAv6.66355@fx18.iad> <hktb5jtc5gcloq387a5i8imvqv3c0c2j5f@4ax.com> <v35d6q$o77a$1@dont-email.me> <ebec5j50o2l4pkoboqu1voe563r90ci1f8@4ax.com> <v35f8g$ojef$1@dont-email.me> <v37fuq$o77a$3@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Wed, 29 May 2024 21:43:24 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2f53e1d4256fc4974268c797af5613fc"; logging-data="1353906"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/3dM6RwdKN+LtmAi+BgjHgFacp5oheR5E=" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:KD/WIuVbQmLndhrnupUuc9014wM= sha1:9l6LY2RGoLRgUQtJhbADBsWwxlc= Bytes: 4467 Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com> writes: > On 5/28/2024 4:36 PM, AMuzi wrote: >> On 5/28/2024 3:25 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: >>> On Tue, 28 May 2024 16:01:30 -0400, Zen Cycle <funkmaster@hotmail.com> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> On 5/28/2024 12:15 PM, Jeff Liebermann wrote: >>>>> 3.63 lbs of static thrust will lift 3.63 lbs off the ground. That's >>>>> adequate for lifting a small amount of wet grass, but hardly enough to >>>>> lift a grass bag and "suck" it into the blades. >>>> >>>> But that's missing the most salient point: Lawnmowers are designed such >>>> that the bag is unaffected by any suction created under the mower. >>> >>> Umm... that's what I wrote. The static thrust produced by the mower >>> blades acting like a fan isn't going to lift the bag much less suck it >>> into the blades. >>> >>> I'm not sure if unaffected is a suitable description. There is a >>> little suction and therefore there will be some effect. However, for >>> moving the grass clipping into the bag, it's done mostly by >>> centrifugal force. >>> >>>> The only way the bag could get suck into the blades is >>>> if the bag came off the mounts and tommy ran over it. >>> >>> That assumes that Tom owns a lawn mower. >>> I still don't believe that Tom owns a lawn mower for his small lawn. >>> >>>> IOW - tommy was doing it wrong....again. I still suggest MWI. >>> >>> "Can You Get A DUI While Mowing Your Lawn?" >>> <https://www.norcalcriminallaw.com/2018/07/22/dui-laws/> >>> "It is unlawful for a person who is under the influence of an >>> alcoholic beverage to drive a car, or truck, or motorcycle or even a >>> lawn mower." >>> >>> But ossifer, it cuts better with a little ethanol octane booster added >>> to the gasoline. >>> >> I am not an attorney and certainly not licensed to the California >> bar. >> But my understanding is that 'impaired driving' statutes apply only >> to the public way. >> https://california.public.law/codes/ca_veh_code_section_23152 >> That is, drunken lawnmowing or felling trees with a chainsaw or >> roofing on your own property is your own problem. And likely will be >> a problem, just not a criminal violation under CA SS 23152. >> And yes people are regularly cited for impaired driving of >> everything from full size tractors and construction equipment to toy >> cars, lawnmowers and golf carts on the public way. Which is fine >> with me BTW. > > There have been cases in Mass where people have been arrested for DUI > in their own driveway. AFAIUI, the critical point is where the car > keys were at the time - in the ignition shows intent. Not in the > ignition, no intent. That was many years ago, things may have changed > since then. At least one thing has changed: It seems to be impossible these days to buy a new car that actually requires putting a physical key into a physical slot. Just having the key somewhere in the general vicinity of the vehicle is enough to allow it to be driven.