Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<87msg6cjh0.fsf@example.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.programmer
Subject: Re: OT: Windows
Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 19:17:15 -0300
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <87msg6cjh0.fsf@example.com>
References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me>
	<wwvh66p9ntv.fsf@LkoBDZeT.terraraq.uk>
	<vkmjos$284i0$1@news.xmission.com> <86wmflc83k.fsf@example.com>
	<vkncr9$3suk2$1@dont-email.me> <vkne4c$3t9p2$1@dont-email.me>
	<vknes1$3tgb8$1@dont-email.me> <vknfo3$3tlrt$1@dont-email.me>
	<vkpkn3$ga7s$1@dont-email.me>
	<slrnvn33ai.btv.apple.universe@freight.zombinet>
	<vks674$14lgi$1@dont-email.me> <vl5jdp$38s8m$1@dont-email.me>
	<0azdP.296066$DYF8.131534@fx14.iad> <vl7bf3$3j0kk$1@dont-email.me>
	<1PVdP.468818$oR74.302907@fx16.iad> <vlb1j3$dolo$1@dont-email.me>
	<87frlyrf2e.fsf_-_@example.com> <vlcbpg$l1os$8@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Sat, 04 Jan 2025 23:17:16 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="5cb1bd16bd6d6af1cba28574274e482c";
	logging-data="696449"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/x51snBF9Gt9PM3uFjP3H3k3ZH+N8b6N4="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:scrWu1msbYIo1TFlvfZQ47pCiAQ=
	sha1:MtW2nJM4q4hb2inTmYeggc8Z91o=
Bytes: 2165

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:

> On Sat, 04 Jan 2025 08:31:05 -0300, Salvador Mirzo wrote:
>
>> For instance, is there any Windows software that
>> handles a TCP connection in an accept-fork-exec fashion?
>
> Almost certainly not. Because process creation is an expensive operation 
> on Windows.
>
> Windows NT was masterminded by Dave Cutler, who was previously responsible 
> for the VMS OS at his previous employer, DEC. He was a Unix-hater, part of 
> a bunch of them at DEC. They would instinctively turn away from Unix ways 
> of doing things, like forking multiple processes. So the systems they 
> created did not encourage such techniques.

Is that Dave with a YouTube channel?