Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<87plj82ico.fsf@example.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Salvador Mirzo <smirzo@example.com> Newsgroups: comp.misc Subject: Re: Schneier, Data and Goliath: no hope for privacy Date: Sun, 23 Feb 2025 23:21:11 -0300 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 119 Message-ID: <87plj82ico.fsf@example.com> References: <67b21894$14$17$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <28416cc3-e819-886a-4025-2b2588f88663@example.net> <87a5ale0vg.fsf@example.com> <0310a638-3153-f886-5206-9bc8453c1f8e@example.net> <I9TYHjJCB4snFwkN@ku.gro.lloiff> <e7169dec-9cdd-624f-f9e7-fd0548c99d5d@example.net> <8734g9modu.fsf@example.com> <25c6c643-4e94-09d9-48e6-e9cf123e7cd4@example.net> <87seo8fgx8.fsf@example.com> <d25aa64b-6127-3ab1-19c1-0099c685834f@example.net> <87eczscb6w.fsf@example.com> <ede066e9-031f-715b-9d35-af4d1273269b@example.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Mon, 24 Feb 2025 03:21:13 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e3b97fd20bd2d907f4885c7e22f7a781"; logging-data="803027"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/nnzBb7ZdCLdv6z8Xve+aExJLCFzS3AHk=" Cancel-Lock: sha1:jKZF2RIRYrTgEd1FG2xjtQv1Pvs= sha1:PUUZP4XuWl5YpnfOwRN84E8hONU= Bytes: 7416 D <nospam@example.net> writes: > On Thu, 20 Feb 2025, Salvador Mirzo wrote: > >>> Amen! Quite an efficiency hack! =D Another "security" hack I have >>> implemented for my father is that I have forbidden him from getting >>> government digital ID on his smart phone. This is very funny, >>> because once scammers called him and told some kind of story that >>> ended with them asking him to confirm what ever they wanted by >>> opening the digital ID app (this is how most old people get scammed >>> where I live) and he told them that he doesn't have it, due to >>> security reasons... >>> >>> ... the scammers sighed heavily and just hung up. =D >> >> Lol. If that's not a super inconvenience to your father, then I think >> it's a great solution. Over here these scams are quite a problem too. > > At the moment, everything essential in society has to be able to be > done on paper, so it really is not a problem, and costs about 20-40 > minutes per year in extra writing on actual paper. > > This scares me though! I fear the day when a smartphone is mandatory > in order to participate in society. This will be a sad day indeed. Add > to that, centralbank managed electronic currencies, that can be clawed > back from you, or where you are blocked from spending them in an > instant, if you go against the government, and we have a very > dystopian situation indeed. =/ I would think that there are so many poor people in the world that governments could never really ask anyone to always have a phone. However, I think it's already real that without such tools, the alternative way will be so painful that a person like you or I will likely not choose not to use a phone. I think that's already more or less true in commerce. For instance, I've been at times confronted with the situation that without using Whatsapp, I could not get service. During the pandemics, for example, so many people could not find a way out of following protocols they did not want to follow and even taking chemical substances they did not want to take. So many people I know did not want to do it and did it anyway because it was a hassle otherwise. >> I also do talk to my father quite a lot about such matters. And >> anything suspicious at all, he always talks to me. In fact, I've talked >> to my entire family about such things. To always let one another know >> about these events---to talk often among us. We learn more and so we >> protect ourselves more. > > This is good advice! My father and I, and my wife, talk about these > things, but we never formalized it, so that we say that we should talk > to each other in case anyone does get a weird message. > > I read that in order to protect against voice cloning, you should > decide on a family password as well. This we also haven't done. But I > am currently working on a small IT-security curriculum for retired > people, and that class will include an example of voice cloning to > show them how it works, and what they can expect. I haven't done something like that either. But, you know, I'm going to propose that this week---I think it's a very good idea. I'm meeting most of my family in two days. >> The reason we can be so good at handling this computing world is because >> we are pretty much obsessed about it; we spend the entire day thinking >> about it; reading about it; writing about it. By talking more with our >> families about these matters, they do learn more from us. Of course, we >> can't expect they'll be coworkers. We need to take things very slowly >> and only as much as they can handle it. Then it becomes kind of fun for >> them too and then they learn a bunch. > > This is true. But this also requires some amount of simplification in > order for it not to become an energy drain. That is why I like my way > of limiting communication to phone and email. It only leaves two doors > open which is easier to defend than 3 or 4 or 5 doors open. ;) Quite right. >>>>> So I find this to be a hueg benefit! I am also lucky because I run my >>>>> own company, so my business partners know that if they want to reach >>>>> me, they have 2 options, email or phone, and all of them accept that. >>>> >>>> Nice to hear you run your own business. >>> >>> Yes, it is the best thing that has ever happened to me except for my >>> wife. I am truly blessed and am very thankful for it every single >>> day. =) >> >> Nice to hear that your wife is the best thing that ever happened to you. >> I unfortunately can't yet say the same. I'm single, although I'd love >> to have little kids running around and through the house. :) But first >> I gotta find someone who I love and who loves me. > > In my experience, as long as you are living a positive life, and don't > get caught in depression, and caught by unreasonable aesthetic > standards, this will happen in time. That's *very* good to hear as this is the most important thing to me. I feel very much protected from all of these malaise (for lack of a better word). > As for children, no such thing for me, since biologically I have an > extremely low chance of having children. On the other hand, my parents > got the same diagnosis from the doctor, and they had me, and the > doctor said it was not possible according to science, so who knows? ;) I am sorry for hearing the news, but I also feel that we should hope for the best here. I think nobody should trust doctor's predictions. I certainly don't know the reasons you might have low chance of having children and let's remember this is a public forum. The subject does me remind me of a conversation with epidemiologist Shanna Swan, which I have been slowly rewatching again---it's a 2h conversation. The entire conversation is very interesting. In this conversation, we can learn that male fertility is decreasing by 1% *per year*. Shanna Swan on male fertility (et cetera) https://youtu.be/C9aqGqjC1kE