| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<87qzzmhdy6.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.misc,comp.programming
Subject: Re: Writing Python Code More Concisely Than Perl!?
Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 02:25:53 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <87qzzmhdy6.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <v2c21f$37ibf$2@dont-email.me>
<2x2dnWlc86XdcNH1nZ2dnZfqnPidnZ2d@giganews.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Sat, 14 Jun 2025 11:25:59 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="53ab99dfdf6109a2d391000ecb9ba986";
logging-data="118676"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/ByJ5e42HNFwmtvW5LtCXM"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:G+v2cxW3gF52SfT3JRaTUa16TaU=
sha1:3lc9G2uRr/ckATbKItB8tnvHHdg=
c186282 <c186282@nnada.net> writes:
[...]
> Frankly, Python is just generally 'better' these days.
> Maybe not AS 'concise' but more 'readable' AND easier
> to understand six months from now. The speed is now
> 'adequate' and Python-4 is supposed to be even faster.
Where are you getting your information? There are no plans for
Python 4.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */