Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.quux.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell
Subject: Re: a sed question
Date: Sat, 21 Dec 2024 21:09:25 -0800
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 16
Message-ID: <87r060uwvu.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <874j304vv3.fsf@example.com> <vk6if0$2n5s$1@dont-email.me>
	<vk7ar2$7g01$4@dont-email.me> <vk7kts$9evn$1@dont-email.me>
	<vk7meu$9jp7$2@dont-email.me>
	<87v7vcv9in.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
	<vk7rdi$ae6m$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 06:09:28 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="05490bf84a23842e58914ee4885380df";
	logging-data="523233"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19bEvjHAMx/T6prcqSSUEAa"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:lx5ZOYRdmbkTuqEPt+9/UwaY31o=
	sha1:N89oywP3YeTVFM/4CK885V/civA=
Bytes: 1813

Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
> On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 16:36:32 -0800, Keith Thompson wrote:
>> I'd be surprised to
>> see *any* Linux distribution (other than small embedded systems) that
>> doesn't include awk (either gawk or mawk, or even busybox awk) by
>> default.
>
> The point being, it would likely be easier to remove Awk than to remove 
> Perl.

Which is quite different from what you wrote, which was that "you’re
more likely to find Perl than Awk on a Linux system".

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */