| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<87r0aoesh4.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: technology discussion =?utf-8?Q?=E2=86=92?= does the world need
a "new" C ?
Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 02:18:15 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 21
Message-ID: <87r0aoesh4.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <v66eci$2qeee$1@dont-email.me> <20240711115418.00001cdf@yahoo.com>
<v6oamt$2d8nn$1@dont-email.me> <v6oct4$2djgq$2@dont-email.me>
<v6of96$2ekb0$1@dont-email.me> <v6ovfc$2hcpf$1@dont-email.me>
<v6p4hf$2icph$1@dont-email.me> <v6qgpu$2t6p7$3@dont-email.me>
<v6r33m$30grj$1@dont-email.me> <20240712154252.00005c2f@yahoo.com>
<86o7717jj1.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v6ti10$3gru4$1@dont-email.me>
<v78af7$1qkuf$1@dont-email.me> <20240717163457.000067bb@yahoo.com>
<v78piu$1su4u$1@dont-email.me> <86a5hep45h.fsf@linuxsc.com>
<v9ktep$v5sk$1@dont-email.me> <87y14xsvnh.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
<v9l95b$10ogv$1@dont-email.me> <87sev5s51s.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
<20240816121015.0000579b@yahoo.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Fri, 16 Aug 2024 11:18:16 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="1d04e40206551ed72fc82578ee5a10bf";
logging-data="1461551"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19Jc72F8yq139a1pYDkxLo2"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:rrM8aZwmisTI54mq/yayFRZs3yc=
sha1:8RGnfHVi0D/ocLYtPrxx3j/K0sc=
Bytes: 2558
Michael S <already5chosen@yahoo.com> writes:
[...]
> IMHO, C++ is a particularly bad example.
> Yes, C++ has call-by-reference misfeature. But arrays in C++ are
> 2nd class citizen, same as in C. They can't be assigned and can't be
> passed to callee, neither by value nor by reference.
>
> Also, I suspect that if you ask Ken Thompson, he will tell you that C++
> does not really have 'call by reference'. Instead, it has references as
> 1st class object, so, naturally, values of references can be used
> during 'call by value'.
> I have enough of respect to KT to consider that his POV is not a
> nonsense.
Is that an attempt at proof by authority? Not only does Ken Thompson
have very little to do with C++, but you're basing your conclusion on
what you *suspect* he would say.
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */