| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<87sentkoni.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Which code style do you prefer the most?
Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 03:42:41 -0800
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 28
Message-ID: <87sentkoni.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <vpkmq0$21php$1@dont-email.me> <vpl62m$250af$1@dont-email.me>
<87frk10w51.fsf@onesoftnet.eu.org> <vpn8vs$2jmv1$1@dont-email.me>
<vpn92i$86q$1@reader1.panix.com> <vpnfmn$2ksdj$1@dont-email.me>
<vpni33$2ld5k$1@dont-email.me> <vpnrld$2mq8h$2@dont-email.me>
<vpourn$30a9h$1@dont-email.me> <vpq1es$35inm$1@dont-email.me>
<vpr019$3b2ld$1@dont-email.me> <20250228144442.00002037@yahoo.com>
<868qpnw2sn.fsf@linuxsc.com> <gRjxP.122767$FVcd.55407@fx10.iad>
<8734ftn1fb.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
<vq5rc8$1j356$6@dont-email.me> <vq6250$1nve4$1@dont-email.me>
<vq63md$1o5s3$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Tue, 04 Mar 2025 12:42:46 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ec036b031ec9540f8be3589d056f824a";
logging-data="1958152"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/HdJq84PfKpEx1EStkkvPD"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Qhk0guyLLsiseILPXFv0+wyj8wE=
sha1:6sngMqxDeNJN1sjGTAn7hJhaAoA=
Bytes: 2492
Lawrence D'Oliveiro <ldo@nz.invalid> writes:
> On Tue, 4 Mar 2025 06:12:54 +0100, Janis Papanagnou wrote:
>> On 04.03.2025 04:17, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:
>>> Where did 132-column printers come from?
>>
>> From IBM ? - Or S&H ?
>
> The point being, the idea that 80 columns is a good line length for
> programming is, shall we say, based on doubtful evidence.
Why are you writing that in (indirect) response to a post in which I
already acknowledged that?
If your question about 132-column printers was intended to make a point,
why not just make that point directly?
From upthread, where I summarized the technological background for
80-column lines:
"""
I'll just note that the fact that 80 is an arbitrary number, based on
technologies we no longer use, doesn't automatically mean that it's a
bad rule of thumb for line length.
"""
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */