Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<87tthr190f.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.nobody.at!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Whaddaya think? Date: Mon, 17 Jun 2024 15:48:00 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 23 Message-ID: <87tthr190f.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <666ded36$0$958$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <20240616015649.000051a0@yahoo.com> <v4lm16$3s87h$4@dont-email.me> <v4lmso$3sl7n$1@dont-email.me> <v4lr0m$3tbpj$1@dont-email.me> <8734pd4g3s.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <v4ltuj$3trj2$1@dont-email.me> <87ed8w3025.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> <868qz4kty7.fsf@linuxsc.com> <v4oiup$gpg0$2@dont-email.me> <66703dfd$0$7081$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v4q5is$t6bd$3@dont-email.me> <6670a59c$0$3747328$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Tue, 18 Jun 2024 00:48:01 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="aed299878570cb32e21d076f9aa05b90"; logging-data="1021804"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19yUPQTzvgLK+V+AlqFRpYH" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:HNAsmpLoYkkLeE8i5CF7wvkv3nI= sha1:ELQ+xqkUY+jR0kgwjANq27wgSas= Bytes: 2198 DFS <nospam@dfs.com> writes: > On 6/17/2024 4:16 PM, Chris M. Thomasson wrote: [...] >> Check this out: >> JOINT STRIKE FIGHTER >> AIR VEHICLE >> C++ CODING STANDARDS >> https://www.stroustrup.com/JSF-AV-rules.pdf > > I want to add a new AV Rule: > > * The Joint Strike Fighter Air Vehicle C++ Coding Standards document > will not leave out Rules 161 and 172. To save readers some time, the numbering in that documents skips rules 161 and 172. The obvious explanation (which I haven't confirmed) is that an earlier version had rules with those numbers that were dropped, and renumbering the other rules was impractical because there were existing references to them. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */