Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Ben Bacarisse <ben@bsb.me.uk>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: How the requirements that Professor Sipser agreed to are exactly met
Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 20:20:49 +0100
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 23
Message-ID: <87v7q3knhq.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
References: <vv97ft$3fg66$1@dont-email.me>
	<1276edeb9893085c59b02bbbd59fe2c64011736b@i2pn2.org>
	<vvqk4s$gldn$12@dont-email.me> <vvqln4$g8ck$5@dont-email.me>
	<vvrftj$ndkg$1@dont-email.me> <vvrima$nejb$3@dont-email.me>
	<vvua3t$1hm37$1@dont-email.me>
	<cd36dcf87daefa9ae472cc426d57704c2baa4292@i2pn2.org>
	<10000hl$1v330$1@dont-email.me> <1000c4g$21dtc$2@dont-email.me>
	<1000ps6$24gr3$1@dont-email.me> <1000qd3$24jh0$1@dont-email.me>
	<1000r3j$24gr3$5@dont-email.me> <1000sa5$24sr2$2@dont-email.me>
	<1000skj$24gr3$9@dont-email.me> <1000t6r$24sr2$5@dont-email.me>
	<1000tbh$24gr3$12@dont-email.me> <100100k$29e7u$2@dont-email.me>
	<ee7015d55d1b71642a631530d0f4d3c52dafed9a@i2pn2.org>
	<1002bgq$2i4bk$5@dont-email.me>
	<f0ebaa2bcf8550ddd66196c23e3b15182ea21045@i2pn2.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 21:20:50 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="0c150fdea895a834ed84415377736ad1";
	logging-data="2774314"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/x4VrKCgBoIo5BDn+hDwh5mBYJU1HhbbI="
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:X7eOLaoyYMnEVs/63XwOB6ELB/g=
	sha1:mFRwue45Er4AnCp4klqd2XZbxRM=
X-BSB-Auth: 1.00343f167ef42860658f.20250514202049BST.87v7q3knhq.fsf@bsb.me.uk

joes <noreply@example.org> writes:

> Am Wed, 14 May 2025 10:06:02 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>> On 5/14/2025 3:17 AM, joes wrote:
>>> Am Tue, 13 May 2025 21:43:32 -0500 schrieb olcott:
>>>> On 5/13/2025 8:58 PM, dbush wrote:
>
>>>> I have the emails where he agreed that I could publish his agreement
>>>> with those exact words. Ben also checked this and verified it.
>>> 
>>> Please publish those instead of paraphrasing.
>>> 
>> He agreed that I could publish this.
>> Ben checked with him at the time.
>
> Ok so you don't have mails. Ben does.

Just to be clear, I did not "check" anything with Sipser.  I alerted him
to the fact that his agreement to a deceptively worded sentence was
being used in public.  Prof Sipser does not agree with PO's wacky ideas.

-- 
Ben.