Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <87v7wfrx26.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<87v7wfrx26.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!2.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From: Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net>
Newsgroups: comp.unix.shell,comp.unix.programmer,comp.lang.misc
Subject: Re: Command Languages Versus Programming Languages
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2024 17:35:29 +0000
Lines: 31
Message-ID: <87v7wfrx26.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
References: <uu54la$3su5b$6@dont-email.me> <vhq11q$nq7$1@reader2.panix.com>
	<877c8vtgx6.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
	<87zflrs1ti.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>
	<vhqed2$c71$2@reader2.panix.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
X-Trace: individual.net P9e1qs6w9Yd9RbHSWz8NUAkxhn8fsv7f/4sXNsweia24JjxbU=
Cancel-Lock: sha1:uMyXjHzIe9ePdISeRVexBDKlsr8= sha1:ovfgefFPHIcuD6sm0yYExG40mkI= sha256:s9QyuRg5Z7b0ASxV2UeYtWek/oGh+JPiPL9SZUNHNH0=
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.1 (gnu/linux)
Bytes: 1836

cross@spitfire.i.gajendra.net (Dan Cross) writes:
> In article <87zflrs1ti.fsf@doppelsaurus.mobileactivedefense.com>,
> Rainer Weikusat  <rweikusat@talktalk.net> wrote:
>>Rainer Weikusat <rweikusat@talktalk.net> writes:
>>
>>[...]
>>
>>
>>> Something which would match [0-9]+ in its first argument (if any) would
>>> be:
>>>
>>> #include "string.h"
>>> #include "stdlib.h"
>>>
>>> int main(int argc, char **argv)
>>> {
>>>     char *p;
>>>     unsigned c;
>>>
>>>     p = argv[1];
>>>     if (!p) exit(1);
>>>     while (c = *p, c && c - '0' > 10) ++p;
>>
>>This needs to be
>>
>>while (c = *p, c && c - '0' > 9) ++p
>
> No, that's still wrong.  Try actually running it.

If you know something that's wrong with that, why not write it instead
of utilizing the claim for pointless (and wrong) snide remarks?