| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<87wmbbyjby.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Loops (was Re: do { quit; } else { })
Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 14:31:13 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 13
Message-ID: <87wmbbyjby.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <vspbjh$8dvd$1@dont-email.me> <vto2mb$20c4n$1@dont-email.me>
<vtu4i5$3hteg$1@dont-email.me> <vtujko$3uida$1@dont-email.me>
<hxOMP.335104$j2D.272394@fx09.iad> <20250419092849.652@kylheku.com>
<vu0t5m$22rjp$1@dont-email.me> <vu0v2n$22n7b$4@dont-email.me>
<vu4cp5$3aou8$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vu5ems$230jl$4@dont-email.me>
<20250421145818.767@kylheku.com> <vu6mtu$3apt8$1@dont-email.me>
<20250421201600.242@kylheku.com> <vu7upq$g2ad$1@dont-email.me>
<20250422071411.99@kylheku.com> <XbPNP.526311$541.90889@fx47.iad>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2025 23:31:14 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="e72db596057d83171632e4a496618536";
logging-data="1489494"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/GcjFA3Sk1fEhG9oSoXf8V"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:44/I8r9wQBLwi4F8oX96cSe2bek=
sha1:5u3dND5rK39OAeLMma9jiWicllc=
Bytes: 1965
scott@slp53.sl.home (Scott Lurndal) writes:
[...]
> And even then, his complaints would never have gained traction;
> the basic syntax of C hasn't changed for forty years, particularly
> with respect to the syntax related to the 'for' keyword.
That's not *quite* true. The syntax of the for loop changed
significantly in C99, allowing for a declaration as the first clause
(a feature borrowed from C++).
--
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */