Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation?
Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 19:34:02 -0700
Organization: None to speak of
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <87wmnk2b1h.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com>
References: <v2ns85$1rd65$1@dont-email.me>
	<cone.1716501172.972762.219193.1004@monster.email-scan.com>
	<v2oeuu$1urqv$1@dont-email.me>
	<cone.1716513008.662818.236297.1004@monster.email-scan.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 04:34:05 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9bf1a2728fa7020763691602348055f5";
	logging-data="2260860"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8wOXgQwqRsAzrw5ZqetM5"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:kDibKeUyP+0hWY0rf8AH+1Alkkg=
	sha1:ZG7c5AbbL8KQZJI8ZWS/pGkEmYA=
Bytes: 1839

Sam <sam@email-scan.com> writes:
[...]
> As I already explained, it's syntactically invalid C, that no
> self-respecting C compiler will accept as well-formed code.

As I already explained, it is a valid C translation unit, once you
delete the line numbers that are obviously not intended to be part of
the code.

olcott will probably claim that I'm supporting his theories.  I am not.
The code he posted is meaningless without knowing how H() is supposed to
be defined.  And to be clear, I'm not asking how H() is supposed to be
defined.

-- 
Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com
void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */