Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<87wmnk2b1h.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Keith Thompson <Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++,comp.lang.c Subject: Re: Can you see that D correctly simulated by H remains stuck in recursive simulation? Date: Thu, 23 May 2024 19:34:02 -0700 Organization: None to speak of Lines: 17 Message-ID: <87wmnk2b1h.fsf@nosuchdomain.example.com> References: <v2ns85$1rd65$1@dont-email.me> <cone.1716501172.972762.219193.1004@monster.email-scan.com> <v2oeuu$1urqv$1@dont-email.me> <cone.1716513008.662818.236297.1004@monster.email-scan.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Date: Fri, 24 May 2024 04:34:05 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="9bf1a2728fa7020763691602348055f5"; logging-data="2260860"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/8wOXgQwqRsAzrw5ZqetM5" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:kDibKeUyP+0hWY0rf8AH+1Alkkg= sha1:ZG7c5AbbL8KQZJI8ZWS/pGkEmYA= Bytes: 1839 Sam <sam@email-scan.com> writes: [...] > As I already explained, it's syntactically invalid C, that no > self-respecting C compiler will accept as well-formed code. As I already explained, it is a valid C translation unit, once you delete the line numbers that are obviously not intended to be part of the code. olcott will probably claim that I'm supporting his theories. I am not. The code he posted is meaningless without knowing how H() is supposed to be defined. And to be clear, I'm not asking how H() is supposed to be defined. -- Keith Thompson (The_Other_Keith) Keith.S.Thompson+u@gmail.com void Void(void) { Void(); } /* The recursive call of the void */