Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<881c71695d1731ccd71c265fa8fd10479624dc3a@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: sci.math
Subject: Re: Incompleteness of Cantor's enumeration of the rational numbers
 (extra-ordinary)
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 07:23:13 -0500
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <881c71695d1731ccd71c265fa8fd10479624dc3a@i2pn2.org>
References: <vg7cp8$9jka$1@dont-email.me> <vj9s4i$11a3p$1@dont-email.me>
 <vjam6d$1700v$1@dont-email.me> <vjc65g$1i9vk$3@dont-email.me>
 <vjf7kl$2s7e5$1@dont-email.me> <vjfmq3$2upa9$3@dont-email.me>
 <c6b624cb0b1b55d54aab969ee5b4e283ec7be3cd@i2pn2.org>
 <vjhp8b$3gjbv$1@dont-email.me>
 <dc9e7638be92c4d158f238f8c042c8559cd46521@i2pn2.org>
 <vjjg6p$3tvsg$1@dont-email.me>
 <c31edc62508876748c8cf69f93ab80c0a7fd84ac@i2pn2.org>
 <vjka3b$1tms$3@dont-email.me>
 <e11a34c507a23732d83e3d0fcde7b609cdaf3ade@i2pn2.org>
 <vjmse3$k2go$2@dont-email.me>
 <069069bf23698c157ddfd9b62b9b2f632b484c40@i2pn2.org>
 <vjooeq$11n0g$2@dont-email.me>
 <c611fdd5710ea4e05d421327898dfd48277b66d6@i2pn2.org>
 <vjpbo0$15bha$2@dont-email.me>
 <7aa4daa380966c031798568433c3a7e079cd29cf@i2pn2.org>
 <vjplmh$177tn$2@dont-email.me>
 <e08128aa5aa13493ccc0f9a4e0473fdc1515cb24@i2pn2.org>
 <vjreth$1lvej$1@dont-email.me>
 <0ea781d0d3fe1c2cb4e900898f655d12de85a403@i2pn2.org>
 <vjsrm0$1tqvv$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2024 12:23:14 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3458403"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vjsrm0$1tqvv$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2524
Lines: 23

On 12/17/24 4:49 PM, WM wrote:
> On 17.12.2024 13:34, Richard Damon wrote:
> 
>> Your logic that if it holds for all FISONs, it holds for N,
> 
> Please explain what Cantor does to apply more than what I apply, namely 
> all n ∈ ℕ.
> 
> Regards, WM
> 

N is an infinte set.

Your FISONS are all finite sets, so none of them are N.

The set is different then each of its members, the whole is more than 
just its parts.

The bijection applies in the infinite set, and only in the infinte set.

That you can't see this, just shows how much your "darkness" is just 
your own blindness.