Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: tomyee3@gmail.com (ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativity Refuted by Elementary Logic
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 14:15:18 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <88470bd5c281f902d8f9ae5a1f390556@www.novabbs.com>
References: <27cf5f58333a92a17fb129caf2cafdd7@www.novabbs.com> <e5568ab7bb5732a4e7c70a64117a7efd@www.novabbs.com> <25a0d003c5b33a49f03e0abeecfc94a2@www.novabbs.com> <6735279b$0$12947$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <5a6d4aafdc6bef1e4410c8c306aa09ac@www.novabbs.com> <6735d63c$1$16832$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <42079e861a831c1258353bda7f9b7772@www.novabbs.com> <67367037$0$28073$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <vh71i3$3b1vr$1@dont-email.me> <673713f3$0$28068$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <fbabd4f1c93e675b336c8ed00a182d4b@www.novabbs.com> <67375103$0$29737$426a74cc@news.free.fr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2586955"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="Ooch2ht+q3xfrepY75FKkEEx2SPWDQTvfft66HacveI";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$8jqHN.maX3hW78mPOPa8guG8P70ZnH2jNymn/UIluLhw5vV1.JPcC
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 504a4e36a1e6a0679da537f565a179f60d7acbd8
Bytes: 2728
Lines: 27

On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 13:47:47 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

> ProkaryoticCaspaseHomolog <tomyee3@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Fri, 15 Nov 2024 9:27:15 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote:

>>> It would be best if we all stopped replying to such postings.
>>> This is just a plainly wrong idea of usenet posting, so abuse,
>>
>> I prefer responding to those of us who evidently "once upon a time"
>> were bright, highly accomplished individuals, but who in their
>> retirement years have become consumed by an obsession against SR
>> and/or Einstein. In a quarter century of visiting these newsgroups,
>> I have actually witnessed a single fringe poster make his way back
>> to sanity. It is my hope to witness such a phenomenon again.
>
> I did read somewhere about some success using an AI bot.
> The AI knows all the standard arguments, and has a vast store of
> responses and refutations.
> And it does not automatically generate an adversarial attitude.
>
> But what is more, it has infinite stamina,
> it will go on with more counter arguments, it will remain friendly,
> and it also has an infinite capacity for suffering fools gladly.
> Report of a pilot study at
> <https://www.fastcompany.com/91203559/how-chatbots-can-win-over-crackpots>

Fascinating!