| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<8893fff4c1f1fc4828b02e0cef1f33c824dee3f4@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: fir <fir@grunge.pl> Newsgroups: comp.lang.c Subject: Re: on named blocks concept Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 18:55:32 +0100 Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <8893fff4c1f1fc4828b02e0cef1f33c824dee3f4@i2pn2.org> References: <4b9a47d628677882c26b2518a78571043ef1bdb9@i2pn2.org> <vggdhl$27v1j$1@dont-email.me> <vggecf$27v1j$2@dont-email.me> <672BC788.6030100@grunge.pl> <vgi5fm$2k8kb$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <672CE2D9.1070206@grunge.pl> <vgio9r$2nfig$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <c35a251488ba0723a2ab4b985bc416778529cd9b@i2pn2.org> <vgispl$2o6r1$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <672CFD3E.9060904@grunge.pl> <vgiv2b$2oj9h$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <672D024E.9030106@grunge.pl> <vgj09g$2oprq$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <672D251C.3030401@grunge.pl> <vgkomh$35mns$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <672E3510.50805@grunge.pl> <vglf64$39ctj$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 17:55:33 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1554679"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="+ydHcGjgSeBt3Wz3WTfKefUptpAWaXduqfw5xdfsuS0"; User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 SeaMonkey/2.24 In-Reply-To: <vglf64$39ctj$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2654 Lines: 24 Bonita Montero wrote: > Am 08.11.2024 um 16:58 schrieb fir: > >> possibly if you woild write it - if you think writing on c is buffer >> overflow for you > C is not suitable for business applications. With that you don't need > that much control over technical details and half the performacne is > sufficient. In C you'd write ten times the code and the code is much > more error-prone. > well first of all i was not saying c is suitable for business aplication i dont know it is just pssible that companies can only hire idiots and idiots may noy be good in c etc what i was sayin that c++ has terroble structural errors (yet to say big prgrams like windows linux wa swritten in c so that is kinda proof etc, but i dont want to talk this kind of idiotic konversatiion when yoy belive something and will repeat it to me on and on as usual... in fact youre not c coder on c group and you share you opinions not javing experience in c coding against people who can code in c and know how it is going)