Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<8893fff4c1f1fc4828b02e0cef1f33c824dee3f4@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: fir <fir@grunge.pl>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c
Subject: Re: on named blocks concept
Date: Fri, 08 Nov 2024 18:55:32 +0100
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <8893fff4c1f1fc4828b02e0cef1f33c824dee3f4@i2pn2.org>
References: <4b9a47d628677882c26b2518a78571043ef1bdb9@i2pn2.org> <vggdhl$27v1j$1@dont-email.me> <vggecf$27v1j$2@dont-email.me> <672BC788.6030100@grunge.pl> <vgi5fm$2k8kb$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <672CE2D9.1070206@grunge.pl> <vgio9r$2nfig$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <c35a251488ba0723a2ab4b985bc416778529cd9b@i2pn2.org> <vgispl$2o6r1$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <672CFD3E.9060904@grunge.pl> <vgiv2b$2oj9h$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <672D024E.9030106@grunge.pl> <vgj09g$2oprq$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <672D251C.3030401@grunge.pl> <vgkomh$35mns$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org> <672E3510.50805@grunge.pl> <vglf64$39ctj$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2024 17:55:33 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1554679"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="+ydHcGjgSeBt3Wz3WTfKefUptpAWaXduqfw5xdfsuS0";
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:27.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/27.0 SeaMonkey/2.24
In-Reply-To: <vglf64$39ctj$1@raubtier-asyl.eternal-september.org>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2654
Lines: 24

Bonita Montero wrote:
> Am 08.11.2024 um 16:58 schrieb fir:
>
>> possibly if you woild write it - if you think writing on c is buffer
>> overflow for you
> C is not suitable for business applications. With that you don't need
> that much control over technical details and half the performacne is
> sufficient. In C you'd write ten times the code and the code is much
> more error-prone.
>
well first of all i was not saying c is suitable for business aplication
i dont know
it is just pssible that companies can only hire idiots and idiots may 
noy be good in c etc

what i was sayin that c++ has terroble structural errors

(yet to say big prgrams like windows linux wa swritten in c so that is 
kinda proof etc, but i dont want to talk this kind of idiotic 
konversatiion when yoy belive something and will repeat it to me
on and on as usual...

in fact youre not c coder on c group and you share you opinions not 
javing experience in c coding against people who can code in c and know
how it is going)