Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<88c580b05da7aacb213e1b24d4eca93abc96be13@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: joes <noreply@example.org> Newsgroups: sci.math Subject: Re: How many different unit fractions are lessorequal than all unit fractions? (infinitary) Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:10:41 -0000 (UTC) Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org) Message-ID: <88c580b05da7aacb213e1b24d4eca93abc96be13@i2pn2.org> References: <vb4rde$22fb4$2@solani.org> <vdu4mt$18h8h$1@dont-email.me> <vdu874$271t$2@news.muc.de> <vdua6f$18vqi$2@dont-email.me> <vdubg3$24me$1@news.muc.de> <4bc3b086-247a-4547-89cc-1d47f502659d@tha.de> <ve0n4i$1vps$1@news.muc.de> <ve10qb$1p7ge$1@dont-email.me> <ve117p$vob$1@news.muc.de> <ve315q$24f8f$3@dont-email.me> <ve46vu$324$2@news.muc.de> <ve5u2i$2jobg$4@dont-email.me> <ve6329$19d5$1@news.muc.de> <ve64kl$2m0nm$4@dont-email.me> <ve66f3$19d5$2@news.muc.de> <ve683o$6c2o$1@solani.org> <ve6a23$19d5$3@news.muc.de> <ve6c3b$6esq$2@solani.org> <48b939c8a1dfbe9ea0f38dd276df4f31bbe17a1f@i2pn2.org> <vedtp9$67jl$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 17:10:41 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1680996"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM"; User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a git.gnome.org/pan2) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2495 Lines: 19 Am Sat, 12 Oct 2024 15:32:25 +0200 schrieb WM: > On 10.10.2024 21:48, joes wrote: >> Am Wed, 09 Oct 2024 18:47:39 +0200 schrieb WM: > >>> Numbers multiplied by 2 do not remain unchanged. That is not intuition >>> but mathematics. >> They do, however, remain natural. > They do not remain the same set as before. They cover more of the real > line. If they all are natnumbers, then there are more than at the > outset. That means potential infinity. If there are not more natumbers > than at the outset, then infinite numbers have been created. There is no > way to avoid one of these results. Of course multiplying a (finite) number by 2 changes the value. If anything, the even numbers cover less, being a subset of the naturals. If doubling a natural yielded omega, there would need to be an n = w/2. That is not defined, nor finite. -- Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math: It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.