Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<890a408bcdec1d8d813126edb227c343@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativity Derives Zero Deflection of Light By Gravity.
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2025 05:22:31 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <890a408bcdec1d8d813126edb227c343@www.novabbs.com>
References: <9f779645de1a83b1f2f35ab0a1885329@www.novabbs.com> <6c677b972f6579892c33b8604d495734@www.novabbs.com> <dc953486fe00737ac101b0808f4adc5f@www.novabbs.com> <b79df979e66ca025b42b54d01b3ffa76@www.novabbs.com> <4cb228952ad1393d1371788608f5ed9f@www.novabbs.com> <I5VnQCRBCASVHb8oVNJIPy8btWA@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1044231"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$o4hcsh8BOMBgMZWRrohab.e8olRPE8VufLz0bz703W/eE972hjN5W
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2603
Lines: 34

On Fri, 21 Feb 2025 2:03:24 +0000, Richard Hachel wrote:

> Le 20/02/2025 à 23:39, clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) a écrit
> :
>>>
>>> This is just an elementary school formula which you never progressed
>>> past.
>>> You are like an adult that forever is stuck practising scales while
>>> claiming Bach and Beethoven never existed.
>>>
>>> --
>>> Jan
>>>
>>> --
>> Everyone can see you cannot explain how anything can have momentum
>> without mass. Resort to ad hominem is a failure to reason.
>
> Ad hominem attacks are unfortunately far too frequent. We don't explain
> anything, we attack.
> Here, I'm not sure that the attack is even scientifically justified,
> because it is wrong to believe that there has been a fantastic evolution
> of thought since p=mv.
> Certainly the relativists understood that p=mv/sqrt(1-v²/c²) but there
> is no need to shout glory to God from the rooftops. They don't even know
> why, and most of them believe that it is mass that is relative, and not
> the perception of speed.
> Don't laugh, friends, I've been reading what scientists and social
> networks say for 40 years.
> And it's scary.
> It's terrifyingly stupid.
>
> R.H.
Of course, p=mv/sqrt(1-v^2/c^2) still requires mass, and it is mistaken
anyway. The state of physics is like a cloud of unknowing. I see that
fog floating around Jan's head.