Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: Energy is for bunny-ahs (traders)
Date: Sun, 24 Nov 2024 16:22:22 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <89cdf05dc6cef1654693ccf754841550@www.novabbs.com>
References: <730c4a156bd268ae1f9342119eb1ff2e@www.novabbs.com> <2frb1l-i61g.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="3939687"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$IkDPsWFT6gy98B.Asv2GmeNtwY0iczrgfJY1iw4KAk8lDxvfblOUC
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 1870
Lines: 24

On Sun, 24 Nov 2024 14:57:08 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> Physics texts should avoid the word "energy" as much as possible.
>>
>> It is an unscientific term as it is so volatile and relative.
>
> This is an absurd statement and everything about it is wrong, crackpot.


Not at all, Penisnino. It is the height of wisdom. The kinetic energy
difference of a chap driving a car with respect to his passenger is
zero. But as all accidents show the kinetic energy difference of that
chap with respect to an obstacle on the ground is much more. So kinetic
energy is a relative notion. Very slimy. Ditto for potential energy.

Amazing how this bad physics was developed, great stupidity somewhere.

Woof-woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof woof

What fools these apes be!

Bertietaylor
>
> <snip remaining nonsense unread>