Path: ...!news.mixmin.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Is this =?UTF-8?Q?=E2=84=99=E2=89=A0=E2=84=95=E2=84=99?= proof
 'humiliating'?
Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 12:37:33 +0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 68
Message-ID: <8a0899879cd56eb74fad7402ca6fb80cbe17f6c7.camel@gmail.com>
References: <e243777ead89baebc46eac4944e43adde8a9ddce.camel@gmail.com>
	 <875xuh51rv.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
	 <0ae353a37b1dcf2926997ff00f7770999ee28b79.camel@gmail.com>
	 <87zfrt3cz8.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
	 <86baca529cc9fc98c1120c86e05e90426facd126.camel@gmail.com>
	 <87cyoo34kd.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Tue, 11 Jun 2024 06:37:34 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="eca6684f110f6525b19aa3cdebea2e25";
	logging-data="946768"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19583EZMQaqjhf8A631AaZZ"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.50.2 (3.50.2-1.fc39)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:bUYQPaKC9+0vS3vhnXaXOYvkaiU=
In-Reply-To: <87cyoo34kd.fsf@bsb.me.uk>
Bytes: 4135

On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 21:50 +0100, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes:
>=20
> > On Mon, 2024-06-10 at 00:36 +0100, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> > > wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes:
> > >=20
> > > > On Sun, 2024-06-09 at 20:55 +0100, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> > > > > wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com> writes:
> > > > >=20
> > > > > > =E2=84=99=E2=89=A0=E2=84=95=E2=84=99
> > > > > > Proved. https://sourceforge.net/projects/cscall/files/MisFiles/=
PNP-proof-en.txt/download
> > > > > > ...[cut]
> > > > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0 Proof2: Let p=3D"Given a number n, determine wheth=
er or not n
> > > > > > is even". If
> > > > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=84=
=99=3D=E2=84=95=E2=84=99, then p=E2=88=89=E2=84=95=E2=84=99=E2=84=82 is a f=
alse proposition because all
> > > > > > =E2=84=95=E2=84=99 problems
> > > > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 includin=
g =E2=84=95=E2=84=99=E2=84=82 are mutually Ptime reducible. Since
> > > > > > p=E2=88=89=E2=84=95=E2=84=99=E2=84=82 is true,
> > > > > > =C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0=C2=A0 =E2=84=
=99=E2=89=A0=E2=84=95=E2=84=99 is concluded.
> > > > >=20
> > > > > Where is your proof that p is not NP-complete?=C2=A0 Since you do=
n't know
> > > > > this subject very well, you would benefit more from asking people=
 to
> > > > > direct you to resources from which you could learn, rather than p=
osting
> > > > > provocative messages.
> > >=20
> > > <silly insults deleted>
> > >=20
> > > > To be on topic, can you show us the p (as mentioned) is NPC or p is
> > > > not NPC, either will do, to prove how much you understand what you
> > > > talked about.
> > >=20
> > > If I could do that I would be rich, quite literally.=C2=A0 Sadly, I c=
an't and
> > > neither can anyone else on the planet (so far).=C2=A0 But if you thin=
k you
> > > can, head over to the Clay Mathematics Institute and persuade them to
> > > give you a million dollars[1].
> >=20
> > Money corrupts soul (I had been rich enough, I know what that means).
>=20
> Every crank has to have a reason why they post in the almost dead corner
> of the Internet rather that publishing, gaining fame and/or fortune or,
> in fact, doing anything to get their apparently radical ideas properly
> disseminated.
>=20
> Over the years, I've probably heard them all.=C2=A0 So you don't want the
> money.=C2=A0 OK.=C2=A0 Why don't you want to publish where mathematicians=
 will
> find out about your ideas?

You and Andy are the opposite kind of crank who believe they are knowledgea=
ble
enough. Both of these people showed many stubborn idiocy not aware of=20
themselves instead stick to past illusion.
Did money drive you crazy? You are too far from my level. Eat the paper or =
title
you had and keep dreaming.