Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <8a5e70674b99f96dc58aad03ed63912d@www.novabbs.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<8a5e70674b99f96dc58aad03ed63912d@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: No evidence
Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 02:24:10 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <8a5e70674b99f96dc58aad03ed63912d@www.novabbs.com>
References: <4144a4a378a851665e4e8cf08dd46467@www.novabbs.com> <vc3l0m$1d7l3$1@dont-email.me> <22237708faf597ef0142e87eb1c821ba@www.novabbs.com> <f3c235167847a5acfb6ebb850598aad1@www.novabbs.com> <f76098bf89ccae80d87243051ec9c4d2@www.novabbs.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2222071"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$TvoSETdje2iSh1AnSIRmX.g1uvJD17rZJ/CBMZZlNEe59OqfAFV5i
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2091
Lines: 23

On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 19:05:35 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote:
>
> Gary: Given that they are isolated, how would relative velocity
> cause them to run slower? (It doesn't cause time itself to dilate.
> That is pure nonsense.)

It certainly is nonsense that velocity causes a clock to run
slower.  Clocks run at their normal rate regardless of velocity
or gravitational potential.

Relativity predicts that measuring such a clock at different
gravitational potentials or in relative motion will get different
results from measuring them when next to the clock.  This is a
fact, valid information.

https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04349-7

https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.12238

"we measure a linear frequency gradient consistent with the
gravitational redshift within a single millimetre-scale sample
of ultracold strontium. Our result is enabled by improving the
fractional frequency measurement uncertainty by more than a
factor of 10, now reaching 7.6 × 10−21."