Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<8a5e70674b99f96dc58aad03ed63912d@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: No evidence Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2024 02:24:10 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <8a5e70674b99f96dc58aad03ed63912d@www.novabbs.com> References: <4144a4a378a851665e4e8cf08dd46467@www.novabbs.com> <vc3l0m$1d7l3$1@dont-email.me> <22237708faf597ef0142e87eb1c821ba@www.novabbs.com> <f3c235167847a5acfb6ebb850598aad1@www.novabbs.com> <f76098bf89ccae80d87243051ec9c4d2@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2222071"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$TvoSETdje2iSh1AnSIRmX.g1uvJD17rZJ/CBMZZlNEe59OqfAFV5i X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2091 Lines: 23 On Sun, 15 Sep 2024 19:05:35 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > > Gary: Given that they are isolated, how would relative velocity > cause them to run slower? (It doesn't cause time itself to dilate. > That is pure nonsense.) It certainly is nonsense that velocity causes a clock to run slower. Clocks run at their normal rate regardless of velocity or gravitational potential. Relativity predicts that measuring such a clock at different gravitational potentials or in relative motion will get different results from measuring them when next to the clock. This is a fact, valid information. https://www.nature.com/articles/s41586-021-04349-7 https://arxiv.org/abs/2109.12238 "we measure a linear frequency gradient consistent with the gravitational redshift within a single millimetre-scale sample of ultracold strontium. Our result is enabled by improving the fractional frequency measurement uncertainty by more than a factor of 10, now reaching 7.6 × 10−21."