| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<8a7fbffe53e5b09ebac78a17b690d744@www.novabbs.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news.misty.com!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1) Newsgroups: comp.arch Subject: Re: My 66000 and High word facility Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2024 22:06:46 +0000 Organization: Rocksolid Light Message-ID: <8a7fbffe53e5b09ebac78a17b690d744@www.novabbs.org> References: <v98asi$rulo$1@dont-email.me> <38055f09c5d32ab77b9e3f1c7b979fb4@www.novabbs.org> <v991kh$vu8g$1@dont-email.me> <2024Aug11.163333@mips.complang.tuwien.ac.at> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2595498"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="65wTazMNTleAJDh/pRqmKE7ADni/0wesT78+pyiDW8A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: ac58ceb75ea22753186dae54d967fed894c3dce8 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$kLI6uHzvP64EfrpGQaTOQOY9pWHShIz4DdjL9fSbZ67t.hOjnpcEC X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 Bytes: 2434 Lines: 39 On Sun, 11 Aug 2024 14:33:33 +0000, Anton Ertl wrote: > Brett <ggtgp@yahoo.com> writes: >>The lack of CPU’s with 64 registers is what makes for a market, that 4% >>that could benefit have no options to pick from. > > They had: > > SPARC: Ok, only 32 GPRs available at a time, but more in hardware > through the Window mechanism. SPARCs FPGA through UltraSPARC used 1 full cycle to access the windowed register file will MIPS, 88K, and early Alphas used 1/2 cycle. So SPARC architecture saddled them with an inherent disadvantage.... > AMD29K: IIRC a 128-register stack and 64 additional registers Similar issues. > IA-64: 128 GPRs and 128 FPRs with register stack and rotating register > files to make good use of them. Don't know for certain, but I would expect the same as above. > The additional registers obviously did not give these architectures a > decisive advantage. Captain Obvious strikes again Oh, and BTW, that 1/2 cycle of delay getting started should have cost ~5% IPC. But SAPRC never achieved high clock frequencies nor dis IA-64. > When ARM designed A64, when the RISC-V people designed RISC-V, and > when Intel designed APX, each of them had the opportinity to go for 64 > GPRs, but they decided not to. Apparently the benefits do not > outweigh the disadvantages. > > Where is your 4% number coming from? > > - anton