Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The Schwarzschild Metric has been refuted.
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 18:27:54 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <8ac1d6e328b187c95493dfc064bb1b44@www.novabbs.com>
References: <c5b55811f1d9185c218d02d03bc8e44b@www.novabbs.com> <vunhqg$2vtup$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2288007"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$IFzzU2XtKD5.phWc4isKpes2VVuBazzd7qD477UeXAwMBJYGYb3Dq
X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180
Bytes: 2245
Lines: 27

On Mon, 28 Apr 2025 9:29:52 +0000, Mikko wrote:

> On 2025-04-25 16:10:42 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen said:
>
>> This metric doubles the Newtonian deflection, so the relativity
>> derivation is invalid.
>>
>> "Using the Newton’s Theory of Gravity to Calculate the
>> Deflection of Light in the Solar System and the Orbital
>> Poles of Light’s Motion of General Relativity"
>> Mei Xiaochun
>
> Actual measurements of the deflection support General Relativity.
> So do the measurements of light travel times. Newtonian gravity
> does not say anything about light. With the additional hypthesis
> that light is a stream of particles with small but non-zero mass,
> which hypothesis is compatible with Newtonian optics, the deflection
> can be computed. The result is refuted by observations but Newtonian
> gravity without the additional hypthesis is not refuted.
Experimental results cannot provide evidence for a fallacious derivation
because that derivation can not predict.

You have forgotten that Galileo proved all masses are affected the same
by gravity.

I take it you mean that adding curved space to Newtonian is not refuted.
It has not been proven because it hasn't been predicted when the
derivation is faulty.