Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: joes <noreply@example.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DD correctly emulated by HHH --- Totally ignoring invalid
 rebuttals ---PSR---
Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 09:27:50 -0000 (UTC)
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <8bc20e52d5f532f91a92a20e5609f1b7931a4d66@i2pn2.org>
References: <vq5qqc$1j128$2@dont-email.me> <vq6g9l$1ptg9$2@dont-email.me>
	<vq722k$1tapm$1@dont-email.me> <vq751g$1t7oc$1@dont-email.me>
	<vq78ni$1u8bl$3@dont-email.me>
	<5e786c32c2dcc88be50183203781dcb6a5d8d046@i2pn2.org>
	<vq866t$23nt0$1@dont-email.me>
	<2002d599ebdfb7cd5a023881ab2faca9801b219d@i2pn2.org>
	<vq8l3d$29b9l$1@dont-email.me>
	<4426787ad065bfd0939e10b937f3b8b2798d0578@i2pn2.org>
	<vq8mam$29b9l$5@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 5 Mar 2025 09:27:50 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2930127"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="nS1KMHaUuWOnF/ukOJzx6Ssd8y16q9UPs1GZ+I3D0CM";
User-Agent: Pan/0.145 (Duplicitous mercenary valetism; d7e168a
 git.gnome.org/pan2)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 2973
Lines: 34

Am Tue, 04 Mar 2025 23:09:42 -0600 schrieb olcott:
> On 3/4/2025 11:07 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 3/4/25 11:48 PM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 3/4/2025 10:44 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>> On 3/4/25 7:34 PM, olcott wrote:
>>>>> On 3/4/2025 5:45 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>>> On 3/4/25 11:11 AM, olcott wrote:
>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 9:08 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 15:17 schreef olcott:
>>>>>>>>> On 3/4/2025 3:14 AM, Fred. Zwarts wrote:
>>>>>>>>>> Op 04.mrt.2025 om 04:07 schreef olcott:


>>>>>>>> So, my claim remains: HHH fails to reach the 'ret' instruction,
>>>>>>>> where the direct execution and some world-class simulators have
>>>>>>>> no problem to reach it.
>>>>>>> DD calls its own emulator when emulated by HHH.
>>>>>>> DD DOES NOT call its own emulator when emulated by HHH1. DD DOES
>>>>>>> NOT call its own emulator when directly executed.
>>>>>> Which just show your stupidity, as DD doesn't HAVE its own
>>>>>> emulator, and CAN'T know who or if it is being emulated.
>>>>> It is not my stupidity it is your dishonestly using the straw-man
>>>>> deception to change the subject away from:
>>>>> DD correctly emulated by HHH cannot possibly reach its own "ret"
>>>>> instruction and terminate normally.
>>>> WHich is the strawman, that you are too stupid to recogines.
>>> I will show that it is not straw-man after you quit dodging that
>>> point.
>> Wrong order,
> I WILL NOT TOLERATE ANY OTHER ORDER
lol "I will explain why this is your argument after you agree to it" smh

-- 
Am Sat, 20 Jul 2024 12:35:31 +0000 schrieb WM in sci.math:
It is not guaranteed that n+1 exists for every n.