Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<8d64a7052e4957a49e3708ae6493b9f8@www.novabbs.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: mitchalsup@aol.com (MitchAlsup1)
Newsgroups: comp.arch
Subject: Re: Is Parallel Programming Hard, And, If So, What Can You Do About
 =?UTF-8?B?SXQ/?=
Date: Thu, 22 May 2025 17:34:08 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <8d64a7052e4957a49e3708ae6493b9f8@www.novabbs.org>
References: <vvnds6$3gism$1@dont-email.me> <27492f8028a0d40eff5071e85214fc36@www.novabbs.com> <100gj7t$1sbnn$11@dont-email.me> <QP%WP.57065$RXsc.38723@fx36.iad> <100iher$2b7vi$2@dont-email.me> <jwvcyc3xd2v.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org> <fcb1f88f53b1a99fae7dc50eaba94f54@www.novabbs.org> <jwvtt5ew3wl.fsf-monnier+comp.arch@gnu.org> <bef78de0c7ac6e7150ed593f70e54221@www.novabbs.org> <100m3cg$38sd4$3@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1475838"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="o5SwNDfMfYu6Mv4wwLiW6e/jbA93UAdzFodw5PEa6eU";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: cb29269328a20fe5719ed6a1c397e21f651bda71
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$kmHd7L4Pun8KDO./4mGzUeXpjdoYIpjO5pkmCzi8QAx0r9vm8BTG.

On Thu, 22 May 2025 2:49:53 +0000, Lawrence D'Oliveiro wrote:

> On Wed, 21 May 2025 14:08:37 +0000, MitchAlsup1 wrote:
>
>> ... when running back-to-back on the same core they are concurrent.
>
> Consecutively, surely (on a time-slice basis).
>
> When a judge sentences you to serve different jail terms concurrently,
> they are not added together.
>
> When two processes run on the same CPU, their execution times are added
> together.

Wall clock time adds.
process times do not.