Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<8dp72j1nh96kepcpm0qc6c6kb4efhgiijp@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Catrike Ryder <Soloman@old.bikers.org> Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech Subject: Re: Coumting bikes Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 12:18:57 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 88 Message-ID: <8dp72j1nh96kepcpm0qc6c6kb4efhgiijp@4ax.com> References: <i9xUN.3850$9pR2.1071@fx13.iad> <3uc52j9593qlqctb3o5uvo4048b753sftc@4ax.com> <uvuelu$3582v$2@dont-email.me> <8nj52j9n90n4jnqgqr7kqq7pr8g9qdpoks@4ax.com> <uvuu4f$38gd9$1@dont-email.me> <uvv60p$3cnjo$1@dont-email.me> <v00mvu$3o1c5$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Date: Sat, 20 Apr 2024 18:19:02 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="2414ee8215bdef44fcf6b200c9f8eec4"; logging-data="3953996"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1/5VDD8yH+tB6X2zez9Ul2rdOr48zNci14=" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZKE5IxDYehATlDaWSnGT3+HNcRU= Bytes: 5043 On Sat, 20 Apr 2024 11:28:59 -0400, Frank Krygowski <frkrygow@sbcglobal.net> wrote: >On 4/19/2024 9:33 PM, AMuzi wrote: >> On 4/19/2024 6:18 PM, Frank Krygowski wrote: >>> On 4/19/2024 4:19 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote: >>>> On Fri, 19 Apr 2024 13:54:55 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 4/19/2024 1:15 PM, Catrike Ryder wrote: >>>>>> Why would >>>>>> anyone choose to ride under somebody else's directions? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> As is often quoted, for every room in heaven there's another >>>>> just like it in hell for someone else. >>>> >>>> Everybody follows their own directions. Some people's directions have >>>> them following other people. >>> >>> So the grumpiest person here, and the one with the most limited riding >>> regime, thinks there's no joy or value in riding with others. >>> >>> On my most recent group ride, I had friendly conversation with at >>> least 8 different people, and I was introduced to a few roads I'd >>> never ridden, some with beautiful scenery. At the group ride's end, I >>> carried on solo for another 16 miles or so at a higher pace. >>> >>> I'm happy to be able to enjoy riding with others or riding solo, >>> riding fast or riding more slowly, riding for recreation or for utility. >>> >>> Some folks are much more limited. >>> >> That's your value judgement on a matter of personal taste. > >Wait - what part is my value judgment? You certainly can't be >disagreeing with "some folks are much more limited"! > >> Meanwhile Mr Tricycle is free to ride wherever he likes with whomsoever >> he pleases. Or with no one. > >Of course he is. I made no commandments. > >> I'm maybe less a misanthrope, but I quit 'group rides' 35 years ago and >> don't miss them, or that sort of conversation, at all. > >And I agree, that's (apparently) fine for you. Some folks like group >rides, some don't. (For me, it depends on the group members.) Me too. I prefer people who don't try to tell me what to do or complain if I don't ride according to their plans and requirements. Well, gosh, I guess that eliminates all group rides. >But at the same time, you don't denigrate those who do choose to >converse with others, or who choose to help others' riding in various >ways - by showing them nice routes they might never discover, by helping >them with mechanical problems, by giving riding tips to newbies, etc. > >I'm also willing to bet that you occasionally give some minor greeting >to a stranger who greets you. At least, you don't brag about ignoring >people who say hello. And (gosh!) you've actually posted photos of you >riding with others! I certainly don't recall you insulting those who >ride with friends. Explaining that I don't understand why some people like to ride in groups is not an insult. >And about my "limited" comment: Everyone has limitations. I have several >friends with capability limitations, including one who restricts his >cycling almost entirely to paths, because of a combination of low power >and nervousness. But he'd never say his bicycling life is as good as >mine. He recognizes his limitations are detriments. Imaginary friends are easy to understand. >Similarly, what if we were to compare your mechanical skills with those >of some newbie mechanic who could install a water bottle cage, but >couldn't adjust a derailleur or install a crankset? <EYEROLL> Comparing Mr Muzi's mechanical skill to somebody who can't adjust a derailleur is not at all similar to comparing your bicycling skills to millions of people who also know how to ride. >Sure, one can use work-arounds (take it to the bike shop; or haul your >bike to a nice safe path-to-nowhere). But lesser capabilities are >detriments. That's fact. Not doing something that one could do if they wanted to do it doesn't seem like much a detriment.