| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<8e1scj57h69psfvtt2e30e3jb9gnk775r9@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!newsfeed.xs3.de!nntp-feed.chiark.greenend.org.uk!ewrotcd!news.eyrie.org!beagle.ediacara.org!.POSTED.beagle.ediacara.org!not-for-mail From: El Kabong <twang@the.noodle> Newsgroups: talk.origins Subject: Re: New SETI search Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 10:04:24 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 43 Sender: to%beagle.ediacara.org Approved: moderator@beagle.ediacara.org Message-ID: <8e1scj57h69psfvtt2e30e3jb9gnk775r9@4ax.com> References: <vaj062$2kr3d$1@dont-email.me> <menqcj1270ta8rjtmasodqi5nkier8rnhl@4ax.com> <vaju6r$2sv5c$2@dont-email.me> <vakhlm$30112$1@dont-email.me> <dikrcjt3115dmeaog758mll3mth67o2ask@4ax.com> <vakofe$315ad$1@dont-email.me> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: beagle.ediacara.org; posting-host="beagle.ediacara.org:3.132.105.89"; logging-data="61228"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@beagle.ediacara.org" To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:rQtjrwlsipknjW8WyybeXFZyjnM= Return-Path: <news@eternal-september.org> X-Original-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org Delivered-To: talk-origins@ediacara.org id 39D7D22986F; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 13:04:30 -0400 (EDT) by beagle.ediacara.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 04CBB22978C for <talk-origins@ediacara.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 13:04:27 -0400 (EDT) id 47F725DC29; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:04:31 +0000 (UTC) Delivered-To: talk-origins@moderators.isc.org by mod-relay-1.kamens.us (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 241745DC26 for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:04:31 +0000 (UTC) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature ECDSA (P-256)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.eternal-september.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 930D15F84A for <talk-origins@moderators.isc.org>; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 17:04:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: name/930D15F84A; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=the.noodle id 3148BDC01A9; Tue, 27 Aug 2024 19:04:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Injection-Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2024 19:04:28 +0200 (CEST) X-Newsreader: Forte Agent 4.2/32.1118 X-Auth-Sender: U2FsdGVkX1899/u/RJ5nIeirDWcdo6BWKzzQWBHjOec= HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.6 smtp.eternal-september.org Bytes: 4433 RonO wrote: > On 8/27/2024 8:27 AM, El Kabong wrote: > > RonO wrote: > >> On 8/27/2024 2:11 AM, Ernest Major wrote: > >>> On 27/08/2024 06:24, El Kabong wrote: > >>>> Previous searches at Aricebo and other sites looked for > >>>> alien signals at 1420 Mhz. They picked that frequency > >>>> because it is a hydrogen line. The thinking is that > >>>> aliens would more likely broadcast there than an > >>>> arbitrary frequency. It never made sense to me because > >>>> the signal will be attenuated by any hydrogen lying in > >>>> the path, and because if you tune in to the hydrogen > >>>> line, you'll find... hydrogen noise! > >>> > >>> The argument is that the 1420 MHz line is less arbitrary, and is not > >>> absorbed by interstellar dust. > > > > Any radio signal is less absorbed by dust than optical > > wavelengths. > > > > 1420 was probably a good pick, but it does have that > > drawback. > > > >> If the aliens had broadcast at 1420 MHz what would be the frequency that > >> we would detect in an expanding universe? I realize that some galaxies > >> are moving towards us, but the red shift indicates that most things are > >> getting further away from us in all directions due to the Big Bang. > > > > Any radio signal we receive will be redshifted. But we > > are not looking for extragalactic signals, they would be > > way too faint. We are looking for something here in our > > own neighborhood of the Milky Way, around 10k lightyears > > max. At that distance the redshift is measurable but > > unimportant, even for a narrow-band receiver. > > This example is looking at other galaxies. > > Ron Okimoto Yes, I missed that obvious statement in the article. Between that, and the wide field nature of the receiving antenna, the aliens would have to broadcast a signal with the power of a star to reach us. I wish them luck.