Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<8iwxRaRsjqrfDwoautailUUdW84@jntp> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!pasdenom.info!from-devjntp Message-ID: <8iwxRaRsjqrfDwoautailUUdW84@jntp> JNTP-Route: news2.nemoweb.net JNTP-DataType: Article Subject: Re: Langevin's paradox again References: <FER4K03RCuXsBiIlfVNSgR0vilQ@jntp> <v7376c$mo0c$2@dont-email.me> <obKUvOe0ugnrZaE9lm7mmPDWGmc@jntp> <v73vsm$rk3i$1@dont-email.me> <1_yKjTpqmsQ9bfJRH4twqjmHrvw@jntp> <v75jn9$1828i$1@dont-email.me> <PhlaOM2P3vZR8IRhh5jXqkoP1tg@jntp> <v76kvc$1e2bb$1@dont-email.me> <BylxrtQ8uTAjH8xGa-w7HrizxuI@jntp> <v78up6$1u5pb$1@dont-email.me> Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity JNTP-HashClient: lj4xTrIB_nTDAIr9YUKUI8MPO5A JNTP-ThreadID: sxhQQgyUgiiv6OcO_6O_beeL7bk JNTP-Uri: http://news2.nemoweb.net/?DataID=8iwxRaRsjqrfDwoautailUUdW84@jntp User-Agent: Nemo/0.999a JNTP-OriginServer: news2.nemoweb.net Date: Wed, 17 Jul 24 17:34:45 +0000 Organization: Nemoweb JNTP-Browser: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64) AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Chrome/126.0.0.0 Safari/537.36 Injection-Info: news2.nemoweb.net; posting-host="e8cbf2474b472b9bb79db3dccb6a856bc1d05409"; logging-data="2024-07-17T17:34:45Z/8952699"; posting-account="4@news2.nemoweb.net"; mail-complaints-to="julien.arlandis@gmail.com" JNTP-ProtocolVersion: 0.21.1 JNTP-Server: PhpNemoServer/0.94.5 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-JNTP-JsonNewsGateway: 0.96 From: Richard Hachel <r.hachel@wanadou.fr> Bytes: 2079 Lines: 14 Le 17/07/2024 à 19:24, "Paul.B.Andersen" a écrit : > Den 16.07.2024 22:43, skrev Richard Hachel: > You are saying that when the physicists who are operating the LHC > know that a proton has gone around the circuit once, it has really > gone around the circuit 78000000/11250 = 6933 times. No one in their right mind has ever said that. It's you Paul who invents "things". It's stupid. I thought you were one of the best posters for sci.physics.relativity, and I have the impression that you are turning into a crank. R.H.