Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: NoBody <NoBody@nowhere.com>
Newsgroups: rec.arts.tv
Subject: Re: ABC settles "rape" claim re: Pres. Elect.
Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 10:25:03 -0500
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 49
Message-ID: <8nbgmj5pr2il3s2putqb9rd3l2sj8h47rn@4ax.com>
References: <Pine.NEB.4.64.2412142206100.6565@panix3.panix.com> <BPWcnY5y78tvh_76nZ2dnZfqn_QAAAAA@giganews.com> <vjv9h0$2eeft$1@dont-email.me> <vk1196$2rgvb$1@dont-email.me> <vk1cmb$2t3mu$2@dont-email.me> <vk1kc9$2uqie$1@dont-email.me> <idnamj9s2b8abh97e3egkk38cv8ggii56o@4ax.com> <vk4bp0$3ifl6$1@dont-email.me> <54ndmj5mta2ohdejaj4mhfjtjr967k9l89@4ax.com> <vk6pud$4akb$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 22 Dec 2024 16:25:04 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="ab013fa5500f8823939672b16f0e23f1";
	logging-data="721716"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18q4neGG/K3XNUPaYxCegTluLxotfwC2Lg="
Cancel-Lock: sha1:Pc+euaWmhDfLW8u8Tu4KjEpgA+4=
X-Antivirus: Avast (VPS 241222-2, 12/22/2024), Outbound message
X-Newsreader: Forte Free Agent 3.3/32.846
X-Antivirus-Status: Clean
Bytes: 3164

On Sat, 21 Dec 2024 11:21:32 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
wrote:

>On 12/21/2024 10:19 AM, NoBody wrote:
>> On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:07:26 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>> wrote:
>> 
>>> On 12/20/2024 7:06 AM, NoBody wrote:
>>>> On Thu, 19 Dec 2024 12:15:53 -0500, moviePig <nobody@nowhere.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 12/19/2024 10:04 AM, Adam H. Kerman wrote:
>>>>>> super70s <super70s@super70s.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2024-12-18 19:58:23 +0000, moviePig said:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> . . .
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Did the jury weigh in on the specific question of whether NY's legal
>>>>>>>> definition of 'rape' had been met, or was it an instruction to them?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm content to let Big Daddy go down in the history books as an
>>>>>>> adjudicated sexual abuser instead of a convicted rapist. Because that's
>>>>>>> what happened, there's no wiggling out of it by his apologists.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> As super70s is relying on discussing facts as accurately reported, he's
>>>>>> unemployable as a member of the mainstream media. Too bad George
>>>>>> Stephanopolous chose to ignore the most basic tenets of journalism; he'd
>>>>>> have saved his employer $15 million.
>>>>>
>>>>> He made a sincere (and for all practical purposes, piddling) error.  I'm
>>>>> not sure why a simple retraction was judged insufficient.
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Over 10 times?
>>>>
>>>> Laughter.
>>>
>>> 10 separate occasions?
>>>
>> 
>> Watch the Nancy Mace interview.
>
>I'd call a single interview a single occasion.
>

It is completely unclear what point you are attempting to make.  Are
you trying say that verbally assaulting a rape victim in an interview
with 10 instances of a libelous statement only counts as a single
libelous statement?  If so, then wow...