| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<8osr2klq9oepgqsva13nljp4aikmh75rkv@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: john larkin <jl@glen--canyon.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: LTSpice model for a SiC MOSFET Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 08:37:12 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 84 Message-ID: <8osr2klq9oepgqsva13nljp4aikmh75rkv@4ax.com> References: <100c4og$t4lo$1@dont-email.me> <n7qj2kpht38kdk82o1hn10sss3ie2vnbrf@4ax.com> <100e4nq$1dhk3$1@dont-email.me> <9n8l2k9pc9jq3iichdq1baq04uqqk13ksg@4ax.com> <100epio$1h4ca$1@dont-email.me> <100ft5h$1s0j$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <100hb9s$24itl$3@dont-email.me> <100i0k2$ea0$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <100ibpi$2at8a$2@dont-email.me> <100if1h$tds$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> <100jsf2$2n1hq$2@dont-email.me> <100kl7l$30hs$1@nnrp.usenet.blueworldhosting.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Wed, 21 May 2025 17:37:12 +0200 (CEST) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="6c51c3ba74ea26aed6e6f24ecf302b14"; logging-data="3060719"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18mvbjq2Zt3bvUNukQUoWul" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:2kVCNrj49gjHmYjHTHPPx67h5SU= Bytes: 5466 On Wed, 21 May 2025 09:42:11 -0400, "Edward Rawde" <invalid@invalid.invalid> wrote: >"Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:100jsf2$2n1hq$2@dont-email.me... >> On 21/05/2025 3:44 am, Edward Rawde wrote: >>> "Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:100ibpi$2at8a$2@dont-email.me... >>>> On 20/05/2025 11:38 pm, Edward Rawde wrote: >>>>> "Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:100hb9s$24itl$3@dont-email.me... >>>>>> On 20/05/2025 4:26 am, Edward Rawde wrote: >>>>>>> "Bill Sloman" <bill.sloman@ieee.org> wrote in message news:100epio$1h4ca$1@dont-email.me... >>>>>>>> On 19/05/2025 1:38 pm, john larkin wrote: >>>>>>>>> On Mon, 19 May 2025 12:23:54 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> On 19/05/2025 12:15 am, john larkin wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> On Sun, 18 May 2025 18:11:58 +1000, Bill Sloman <bill.sloman@ieee.org> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote: >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I'm looking at a problem where somebody wants to step down a 1kV low >>>>>>>>>>>> current source to 3.3V. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> The Baxandall class-D oscillator could do it, but it needs a pair 1.7kV >>>>>>>>>>>> MOSFETs for the job. The Infineon SiC IMH170R450M1 would do it - though >>>>>>>>>>>> it's a much higher current part (10A) than the job needs (about 1mA). >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> I've dived into the Infineon rabbit-hole which promises LTSpice models, >>>>>>>>>>>> but wasn't able to find one. >>>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>>> Does anybody know of a similar - ideally cheaper and smaller - part for >>>>>>>>>>>> which there is an LTSpice model? >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> I use a Cree/Wolfspeed 1200v part, C2M0280120D, in my Pockels Cell >>>>>>>>>>> driver. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> https://www.dropbox.com/scl/fi/5arhyamrp0bl3tgb2fasn/DSC02771.JPG?rlkey=3ttcc2yt6s9nrtdouuv3aneol&raw=1 >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> They do have an LT Spice model library that works. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Gate drive for SiC parts is a bear. I did it myself, but I think there >>>>>>>>>>> are chips for that now. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> There are multi-kilovolt silicon mosfets too. >>>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>>> Baxandal looks to be inefficient and expensive as a low power >>>>>>>>>>> converter. The drain swing is 2x the supply voltage, and it needs two >>>>>>>>>>> fets and a difficult custom transformer. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It isn't going to be inefficient. That configuration is famous efficient. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> The drain swing is actually 1.67 times the supply voltage, but it does >>>>>>>>>> need two switching devices and a specially wound transformer (and we >>>>>>>>>> know how reluctant you are to design them or get them made). >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> It is probably going to be too expensive for the application, and we'd >>>>>>>>>> be grateful for your insights into a cheaper alternative. I can't think >>>>>>>>>> of one. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> I'm not sure what the specs are, but I have a few ideas. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> One could make a flyback converter with a high-ratio transformer. >>>>>>>>> Coilcraft makes some, capacitor charging transformers and CCFLs. There >>>>>>>>> must be crazy cheap Indian or Chinese CCFL transformers. >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ST makes a 1400v NPN transistor for under a dollar. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> But you can't be bothered to post the part number. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> What you should have said is that you couldn't be bothered to use a search engine. >>>>>> >>>>>> I need at least 1.7kV. A 1400V part isn't interesting. >>>>> >>>>> Centuries ago they'd put two transistors in series in the TV horizontal deflection department because a single one didn't have >>>>> enough Vce max. >>>> >>>> The transistor was invented in the 1950's. Decades ago is closer to the mark. >>> >>> LOL sane people would have known what I meant without needing to point that out Bill. >> >> Sane people don't say "centuries" when they mean "decades". > >Does the word "hyperbole" mean anything to you Bill? He's obviously unwell.