Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<8r0thjl4rq4abu9g15g0j95vo10q8d9bgc@4ax.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: john larkin <JL@gct.com>
Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design
Subject: Re: OT: Linix goes politics
Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 11:19:08 -0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 29
Message-ID: <8r0thjl4rq4abu9g15g0j95vo10q8d9bgc@4ax.com>
References: <vff5rp$1c1v6$1@solani.org> <d3gnhj1v9pt3aea029c1q1lotbm7pemrv2@4ax.com> <vfi09d$23gs$1@solani.org> <04jqhjdoje7mjhueqi3iusubfg3vs7plql@4ax.com> <vfjs77$2ao$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vfk36h$3ueps$2@dont-email.me> <vflafr$79f8$1@paganini.bofh.team>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 19:19:08 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="182e38949987c0037a44e541f2cdac84";
	logging-data="586946"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1//FiwBxILZCpd2pzy3Mdgl"
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:OfcNopBQO57RVbaEnNN+T5xjCo4=
Bytes: 2479

On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 12:08:29 -0000 (UTC), antispam@fricas.org (Waldek
Hebisch) wrote:

>Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote:
>> On 10/26/2024 3:58 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote:
>>> Pi Pico is more powerful than the onboard computer.  But there were
>>> also mainframes in ground support center.  Pico can perform more integer
>>> instructions per second than those mainframes, but has less memory.
>>> And mainframes had fast mass storage (drums and a disk farm).
>>> Raspberry PI version 1 has more memory and SD-card has more bandwidth
>>> than several mainframe disks.  OTOH I would avoid SD-card in mission
>>> critical operations, so probably two Raspberries (two for reliablilty,
>>> ground support mainframes also run in redundant configuration) with
>>> external USB SSD discs...
>> 
>> How long do you think any of that would RELIABLY operate in a
>> supraterrestrial environment?
>
>I do not know.  Standard commercial MCU-s are used in many small
>experimental low-orbit statelites, and seem to work, so they may
>be enough.  Certainly before lanching people into space one needs
>to spend time to test and select stuff that will work well there.

Cubesats only last a few years, so commercial parts are often OK.

I have a friend in the small sat business. I'll ask him.

People last a lot shorter time in orbit than uPs.