| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<8r0thjl4rq4abu9g15g0j95vo10q8d9bgc@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: john larkin <JL@gct.com> Newsgroups: sci.electronics.design Subject: Re: OT: Linix goes politics Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 11:19:08 -0700 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 29 Message-ID: <8r0thjl4rq4abu9g15g0j95vo10q8d9bgc@4ax.com> References: <vff5rp$1c1v6$1@solani.org> <d3gnhj1v9pt3aea029c1q1lotbm7pemrv2@4ax.com> <vfi09d$23gs$1@solani.org> <04jqhjdoje7mjhueqi3iusubfg3vs7plql@4ax.com> <vfjs77$2ao$1@paganini.bofh.team> <vfk36h$3ueps$2@dont-email.me> <vflafr$79f8$1@paganini.bofh.team> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Sun, 27 Oct 2024 19:19:08 +0100 (CET) Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="182e38949987c0037a44e541f2cdac84"; logging-data="586946"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1//FiwBxILZCpd2pzy3Mdgl" User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 Cancel-Lock: sha1:OfcNopBQO57RVbaEnNN+T5xjCo4= Bytes: 2479 On Sun, 27 Oct 2024 12:08:29 -0000 (UTC), antispam@fricas.org (Waldek Hebisch) wrote: >Don Y <blockedofcourse@foo.invalid> wrote: >> On 10/26/2024 3:58 PM, Waldek Hebisch wrote: >>> Pi Pico is more powerful than the onboard computer. But there were >>> also mainframes in ground support center. Pico can perform more integer >>> instructions per second than those mainframes, but has less memory. >>> And mainframes had fast mass storage (drums and a disk farm). >>> Raspberry PI version 1 has more memory and SD-card has more bandwidth >>> than several mainframe disks. OTOH I would avoid SD-card in mission >>> critical operations, so probably two Raspberries (two for reliablilty, >>> ground support mainframes also run in redundant configuration) with >>> external USB SSD discs... >> >> How long do you think any of that would RELIABLY operate in a >> supraterrestrial environment? > >I do not know. Standard commercial MCU-s are used in many small >experimental low-orbit statelites, and seem to work, so they may >be enough. Certainly before lanching people into space one needs >to spend time to test and select stuff that will work well there. Cubesats only last a few years, so commercial parts are often OK. I have a friend in the small sat business. I'll ask him. People last a lot shorter time in orbit than uPs.