Path: ...!feeds.phibee-telecom.net!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Joel <joelcrump@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject: Re: Linux 6.11
Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 06:45:17 -0400
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 34
Message-ID: <8sbifjd2gjob1fdiqb0nr4q00neepl0ove@4ax.com>
References: <ll8bvlFqp7pU1@mid.individual.net> <pan$2d7c7$6bbe7257$a3424ceb$3da5d5c0@gnu.rocks> <llb0n0F8ep2U2@mid.individual.net> <pan$def33$a213bc3c$8c953fcc$4965f138@gnu.rocks> <llbd1lF8ep2U12@mid.individual.net> <pan$d2bb1$fb747cae$1363ad43$80ede6aa@gnu.rocks> <66f7c11c$0$3677$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <vdb18a$1m5b6$1@dont-email.me> <66f90cff$0$3244$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <llsjjvFrnukU4@mid.individual.net> <pan$28cb5$3d36560a$8c4b7261$2b8ba76b@gnu.rocks>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Sun, 29 Sep 2024 12:45:17 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="a0a32bf24bba39ad25293dc4d51a81d1";
	logging-data="1819567"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+6yuUTPqgQSgnQY0hwLqHDCIrG3H0GpJo="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272
Cancel-Lock: sha1:CBZtClNlgSsTSzOFynaFrqJGKgc=
OS: openSUSE Leap 15.6, with Wine 9.0 for WinAPI
Bytes: 2553

Lester Thorpe <lt@gnu.rocks> wrote:

>How many GNU/Linux users have even heard of cooledit?  Not very many.
>Cooledit is not included in any distro, except maybe Mageia:
>
>http://fr2.rpmfind.net/linux/rpm2html/search.php?query=cooledit&submit=Search+...
>
>If cooledit were promoted a bit more it may gather a following.
>
>Unlike vim, emacs, and joe, cooledit is a graphical editor with a
>complete GUI interface.
>
>I try to promote cooledit but the narrow-minded, parochial imbeciles
>in this group will summarily reject it because it boggles their little
>minds.


Looks like a piece of shit, actually, get a fuckin' distro.

-- 
Joel W. Crump

Amendment XIV
Section 1.

[...] No state shall make or enforce any law which shall
abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the
United States; nor shall any state deprive any person of
life, liberty, or property, without due process of law;
nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal
protection of the laws.

Dobbs rewrites this, it is invalid precedent.  States are
liable for denying needed abortions, e.g. TX.