Path: ...!3.eu.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: John B. <slocombjb@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: rec.bicycles.tech
Subject: Re: cyclists attack auto driver
Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 07:44:41 +0700
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 52
Message-ID: <8vdacjt2t471n615knspf3nhpsoh64rdho@4ax.com>
References: <4pk4cjh6lokkmah8hu0dfqu0gq99akff7l@4ax.com> <v9u4bv$2is2s$3@dont-email.me> <nns5cjhvfa23vbjhongnv94u0bs1ags6tl@4ax.com> <gj06cj1kimofmc8u9kt250diqmchn1pf2d@4ax.com> <v9voo7$2tip9$4@dont-email.me> <omp6cj9hm1c9bh8l5a9dee0ps37siiqoa0@4ax.com> <bhn7cjldbqvv58f67m3pbo1fcvjdbphser@4ax.com> <va0tks$3793q$4@dont-email.me> <s3o8cjdesesc2mgr60t2t9rdjqrv12m2l8@4ax.com> <tnq8cjd26q686281q3kmkmbok4gkj9u2j7@4ax.com> <va2d5d$3e7nj$3@dont-email.me> <va2dvn$3e21c$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 02:44:42 +0200 (CEST)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="3fa36510dbdff02bcf6c7820cf693af7";
	logging-data="3763267"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+oV9RGmaOW3EffRSM613xm2XqFAnJAZw4="
User-Agent: ForteAgent/7.10.32.1212
Cancel-Lock: sha1:8AsWXKT0zcPnbiQHvMmJM27cgPE=
Bytes: 3211

On Tue, 20 Aug 2024 10:50:14 -0500, AMuzi <am@yellowjersey.org> wrote:

>On 8/20/2024 10:36 AM, Frank Krygowski wrote:
>> On 8/20/2024 7:09 AM, John B. wrote:
>>>
>>> Does the term adroit come to mind here, as in Frankie is 
>>> adroit at
>>> changing the terms to justify his ignorance?
>>>
>>> The original of this 6 rounds in 1 minute  discussion was 
>>> Frankie
>>> seeming assertion that 6 rounds a minute was probably all 
>>> that was
>>> possible with common fire arms
>> Nope, that's a lie. Here's the direct quote of what I said:
>> 
>> "My bet is also that your family never owned a gun that 
>> could fire more than, say, six rounds in a minute. After 
>> all, that capability is essentially useless for almost all 
>> hunting."
>> 
>> Note I said "_more_ than six rounds" and you proudly bragged 
>> about being able to shoot only six.
>> 
>> Note that I did not claim such guns were not common. I said 
>> I bet your family did not own one. That's not the same 
>> thing, John.
>> 
>> And I said such capability was useless for almost all hunting.
>> 
>> If you could have, you would by now have detailed shooting a 
>> family gun _more_ than six times in a minute, and doing so 
>> to take game while hunting.
>> 
>> But since you haven't mentioned it, we can conclude those 
>> have never happened. Just as I said.
>> 
>> 
>
>All of my firearms can meet that standard, including with 
>reload on the revolver.  As do girlfriend's inherited and 
>worn out Win 30 1890s lever action, the same model from the 
>1950s also worn out, and her .22 rifle. It's a ridiculous 
>standard.

But not, obviously, to someone that knows literally nothing (well
except that the go "BANG") about firearms.
-- 
Cheers,

John B.