Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<904e504174b20e7f1cd4884a57d3b23d70032dcf.camel@gmail.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: wij <wyniijj5@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Every sufficiently competent C programmer knows --- Very Stupid
 Mistake and Liars
Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 22:12:55 +0800
Organization: A noiseless patient Spider
Lines: 36
Message-ID: <904e504174b20e7f1cd4884a57d3b23d70032dcf.camel@gmail.com>
References: <vqntaq$1jut5$1@dont-email.me> <vqp388$1tvqa$1@dont-email.me>
	 <vqpdv9$202b2$2@dont-email.me> <vqperb$20c9k$2@dont-email.me>
	 <E6mcnWv3nMa66036nZ2dnZfqnPWdnZ2d@brightview.co.uk>
	 <vqqnk5$28jtr$1@dont-email.me> <vqqonm$28lh2$1@dont-email.me>
	 <vqqq09$28kp8$1@dont-email.me> <vqqq7s$29buv$2@dont-email.me>
	 <vqqrin$28lh2$4@dont-email.me> <vqs0m8$2k732$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Injection-Date: Wed, 12 Mar 2025 15:12:56 +0100 (CET)
Injection-Info: dont-email.me; posting-host="b1d1a71058cf5c4ca483045bfe62fe9f";
	logging-data="2769314"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org";	posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19bwesb5g8SfJNkASKlxqfH"
User-Agent: Evolution 3.54.3 (3.54.3-1.fc41)
Cancel-Lock: sha1:28vjuWHu4iSKsk3uX3JIdyI6scE=
In-Reply-To: <vqs0m8$2k732$1@dont-email.me>
Bytes: 2634

On Wed, 2025-03-12 at 07:03 -0600, Andr=C3=A9 G. Isaak wrote:
> On 2025-03-11 20:29, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>=20
> > Look up "infinite". You keep using that word. I do not think it means=
=20
> > what you think it means.
>=20
> If you continue to engage with Olcott, you will discover that a great=20
> many words don't mean what he thinks they mean.
>=20
> Andr=C3=A9
>=20

True. Hardly any, esp. related to CS,logic.=C2=A0

olcott has problem understanding logic IF/AND (he uses his own definition).=
=C2=A0
olcott has problem understanding his C knowledge is worse than any (of cour=
se
except himself) first year student while there are full of examples out the=
re
in the internet, and books.

It is almost GUARANTEED that all the meaning of CS/logic term from olcott's=
=20
mouth are not what normal people think. So, the discussion is basically two=
=20
people talking two different things. Worst, olcott is in 'preaching mode'.

But, sometimes I think things may not be so bad. Debating with olcott can
increase the related knowledge, and confidence and making people feel=C2=A0=
full
of hopes (because he is so idiot). Of course, much less so for people seein=
g
the discussion for years.