Warning: mysqli::__construct(): (HY000/1203): User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\includes\artfuncs.php on line 21
Failed to connect to MySQL: (1203) User howardkn already has more than 'max_user_connections' active connections
Warning: mysqli::query(): Couldn't fetch mysqli in D:\Inetpub\vhosts\howardknight.net\al.howardknight.net\index.php on line 66
Article <90792f8f335bdfbf129e53e5c777e925@www.novabbs.com>
Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<90792f8f335bdfbf129e53e5c777e925@www.novabbs.com>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: film.art@gmail.com (JanPB)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Is the theory of relativity a correct =?UTF-8?B?dGhlb3J5Pw==?=
Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 19:22:33 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <90792f8f335bdfbf129e53e5c777e925@www.novabbs.com>
References: <KJQ9SKjGANzT5V7s6pusA4U-X8U@jntp>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="1608233"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="PFHx4vNUwg4V82jPHNtC8poebHXhUv1vbEkgQ31MVis";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 029cc7f3dcda181726743e5c10521a3a9f5bbe97
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$EGlxkpykHntfrKFyPmmRceIxzwv/dFdDqXMNMN02T8uYDj8p67r5C
Bytes: 2063
Lines: 31

Richard Hachel wrote:

> Is the theory of relativity a correct theory?
> If you ask a moron, he'll say no.
> If you ask another idiot, he'll say yes.
> Both are wrong.
> An intelligent man, capable of correctly mastering the whole theory from
> A 
> to Z, will say that it is partly true and partly false, and he will put
> 
> the two camps back to back.

You are overthinking this. The truth is simply that relativity is just
like
any other accepted theory in physics. No "partly" this or "partly"
that.

The only reason this particular theory is constantly being dissected,
almost always incorrectly, by amateurs is that it's a theory with a
low barrier of mathematical entry. This makes it vulnerable to probing
by armchair critics who have no idea about anything else in physics, and
thus
don't understand where relativity came from and why would anyone (like
Einstein) ever come up with such a "weird" thing.

Theories which are far, FAR more bizarre, like quantum electrodynamics,
are spared that fate because they are not accessible without a
formidable
mathematical foundation.

--
Jan