| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<911616334030d9ca343f54c18680f6f5@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder2.eternal-september.org!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: hertz778@gmail.com (rhertz) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: Want to prove =?UTF-8?B?RT1tY8KyPyBVbml2ZXJzaXR5IGxhYnMgc2hvdWxkIHRy?= =?UTF-8?B?eSB0aGlzIQ==?= Date: Sun, 17 Nov 2024 04:22:43 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <911616334030d9ca343f54c18680f6f5@www.novabbs.com> References: <b00a0cb305a96b0e83d493ad2d2e03e8@www.novabbs.com> <539bca7a863c9e1f086b696841672e9f@www.novabbs.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="2831325"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="OjDMvaaXMeeN/7kNOPQl+dWI+zbnIp3mGAHMVhZ2e/A"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Rslight-Posting-User: 26080b4f8b9f153eb24ebbc1b47c4c36ee247939 X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$XuVuCW9Hg/7Zutl3z1XBmOsOnL1Y50oi.dbajJVM8jj0pM1rgEClq Bytes: 1555 Lines: 11 On Sun, 17 Nov 2024 3:52:11 +0000, LaurenceClarkCrossen wrote: > Mr. Hertz: Are you saying you think it was ever proven? Not me. Is ChatGPT that indicates that there are no historical records about experiments of this kind. Maybe BECAUSE nobody like the results. Even when it operates near the limits of technology available for the last 20 years, the concept itself is extremely simple to understand and, as ChatGPT wrote, it's a novel way to prove/disprove E=mc² at optical level.