Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: hitlong@yahoo.com (gharnagel)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: Relativistic aberration
Date: Sun, 11 Aug 2024 13:08:10 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <921cee453f06f441f282c56122f8d2e9@www.novabbs.com>
References: <QsysQnpetTSlB_zDsjAhnCKqnbg@jntp> <1b0910c819bb031839b21557a19c75be@www.novabbs.com> <_hiIkN_NB6Jm2XOJZeHK7Fy9L2E@jntp> <1f081cbe82f7c86f1463b0bf5ad957a9@www.novabbs.com> <9mrYetkghLXwIcwZUl4c8b3LTKI@jntp> <f21b77862f36ab6a27fd237fda9661f8@www.novabbs.com> <Rsj9fwaYx7xWTx_LjgnuDLRLG0M@jntp> <6f498e8663ec0b05b9cd9e03df9b4de4@www.novabbs.com> <tWsKauuW6XViPa1OVHe8GAFt0pY@jntp> <0cb92f486425b83cdc71dbdea3093427@www.novabbs.com> <2EXLnr_H9bJJ03uqOqvAke2Stu0@jntp> <40a7f3651fa003ba04b12ddd79ee55b1@www.novabbs.com> <lfp8pbFkr1mU1@mid.individual.net> <277d12ea32119cb16056773223fe1a45@www.novabbs.com> <17e2ff3657424607$138252$505029$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com> <8c5cae32d7b5302644e335db90064dec@www.novabbs.com> <17e31d9f0ea34274$12530$558427$c2065a8b@news.newsdemon.com> <e0281ec04148bf85dfc7103c807d52c4@www.novabbs.com> <17ea6b2dc47c9dec$254539$505064$c2265aab@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2201534"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="p+/k+WRPC4XqxRx3JUZcWF5fRnK/u/hzv6aL21GRPZM";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 47dad9ee83da8658a9a980eb24d2d25075d9b155
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$tMw/cpB8v7DU08KvHsUSyeL48uiBP52gKMwyczkTItijTswfpqr7K
Bytes: 2785
Lines: 29

On Sat, 10 Aug 2024 16:34:11 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
>
> W dniu 10.08.2024 o 18:20, gharnagel pisze:
> >
> > On Wed, 17 Jul 2024 21:34:12 +0000, Maciej Wozniak wrote:
> > >
> > > Well, Harrie, do you see any difference between
> > > the claim "speed of light is always equal to
> > > c" and the claim "speed of light is  always  locally
> > > equal to c"?
> >
> > Wozzie is dissembling again, conflating SR with GR.
>
> Harrie is lying and slandering again, as expected
> from a relativistic doggie.

Just telling it like I see it.  Wozzie is projecting
his own dishonesty and slandering.

> > In SR c is constant for all inertial observers.
>
> And in his GR shit your idiot guru had to abandon
> that. Even such an idiot couldn't stick to such
> an idiocy for a long time.

As everyone with a brain bigger than a walnut can
see, Wozzie, the disinformation greasy monkey, is
slandering and lying again, even about a dead guy
who can't defend himself.  That makes Wozzie a
grotesque bully, too.