Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: The failure of the unified field theory means general relativity fails.
Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 02:54:54 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <9283a49bcc091b1f621ebd566d650a38@www.novabbs.com>
References: <693b1f71c994c268d60983eb81fc6aaa@www.novabbs.com> <rQzdO.250256$RcM6.3626@fx13.ams4> <17db55a7e5709ab7$1933$480477$c2365abb@news.newsdemon.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="871285"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="e/c594/k+DpN5wgh4wNSTzdRTGbv1jGbBBUwvKr4Q3Y";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Posting-User: 429c285600844fd6252e8828c51a974f0457e863
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$oyO/ygT7NkzArW.jifoF3.eGMFmNMprPmb2EKWwZCTimLng4Jug1C
Bytes: 1366
Lines: 4

Paul Anderson, thanks for the pdf. Your formula employs the
electromagnetic assumption that gravity moves at the speed of light.
Your formula (1) has c^2 and it is clearly not 1^2, and is in m/s,
contrary to Lodder. Then, your angular momentum is derived from an
electromagnetic assumption.