Deutsch   English   Français   Italiano  
<928ebbd74ed71ad5853dedb8d95db1ce7c3b848d@i2pn2.org>

View for Bookmarking (what is this?)
Look up another Usenet article

Path: ...!news.snarked.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: DDD simulated by HHH cannot possibly halt (Halting Problem) ---
 mindless robots
Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 06:54:07 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <928ebbd74ed71ad5853dedb8d95db1ce7c3b848d@i2pn2.org>
References: <vsnchj$23nrb$2@dont-email.me> <vsrmn8$2o2f2$1@dont-email.me>
 <vstku7$p4u7$1@dont-email.me> <vsu95l$1c5kt$1@dont-email.me>
 <vt01l0$39kn7$1@dont-email.me> <vt28vk$1fe7a$1@dont-email.me>
 <vt2k6t$1onvt$1@dont-email.me> <vt3ef4$2flgf$1@dont-email.me>
 <vt3fgd$2gu7u$1@dont-email.me> <vt6apu$12sjs$2@dont-email.me>
 <vt6g1f$180qf$1@dont-email.me> <vt6lmk$1djk6$1@dont-email.me>
 <vt7tj4$2iso2$1@dont-email.me> <vt9j0j$1snb$2@dont-email.me>
 <vtai1c$11kqr$1@dont-email.me> <vtajkf$10asg$2@dont-email.me>
 <vtbe3g$1vs00$1@dont-email.me>
 <852f89c9196e0261b8156050fea4572fe886933f@i2pn2.org>
 <vth52t$3in23$9@dont-email.me> <vth557$3a127$7@dont-email.me>
 <vth8lr$3n2du$2@dont-email.me>
 <a8ab995b650b894cbfb635478f7406c4eee4d187@i2pn2.org>
 <vthqtc$5g2e$2@dont-email.me>
 <63af93cb608258cc3e12b9bab3a2efa0b7ee7eee@i2pn2.org>
 <vtit6a$15e5s$3@dont-email.me> <vtivmo$19aqd$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtkc4l$2h48g$3@dont-email.me> <vtkdnm$2iqu5$1@dont-email.me>
 <vtkkge$2si58$2@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Injection-Date: Tue, 15 Apr 2025 11:05:24 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="446610"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <vtkkge$2si58$2@dont-email.me>
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Content-Language: en-US
Bytes: 3686
Lines: 52

On 4/14/25 11:41 PM, olcott wrote:
> On 4/14/2025 8:45 PM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>> On 15/04/2025 02:18, olcott wrote:
>>> On 4/14/2025 7:39 AM, Richard Heathfield wrote:
>>>> On 14/04/2025 12:56, olcott wrote:
>>>>
>>>> <snip>
>>>>
>>>>> When people insist that a termination analyzer reports
>>>>> on behavior other than the behavior that its finite string
>>>>> input specifies this is isomorphic to requiring a perfectly
>>>>> geometric square circle in the same two dimensional plane,
>>>>> simply logically impossible, thus an incorrect requirement.
>>>>
>>>> A termination analyzer that works is simply logically impossible, 
>>>> thus an incorrect requirement.
>>>>
>>>
>>> THAT IS A STUPID THING TO SAY THAT COMPLETELY IGNORES WHAT
>>> COMPUTABLE FUNCTIONS ARE AND HOW THEY WORK.
>>
>> You said precisely the same thing in reply to dbush. I have addressed 
>> your remark there, so I see no value in repeating my reply here.
>>
>>> HHH CORRECTLY REPORTS ON THE PATHOLOGICAL SELF-REFERENCE THAT
>>> ITS INPUT SPECIFIES. THE DIRECT EXECUTION HAS NO SUCH PSR.
>>
>> You say so, 
> 
> Ignoring verified facts does not make them go away.

Right, like the fact that when the exact input given to HHH is 
correctly, and completely, simulated, it reaches a final state.

> 
>> but as it's you saying it and you can't even turn off CAPS LOCK I see 
>> no reason to believe that you have the capacity to be right, 
> 
> Belief and disbelief are inherently fallible.
> Only comprehension ultimately rules.

Which you have shown a failure to have.

> 
>> so I think I'll wait until your claim is confirmed by an independent 
>> observer.
>>
> 
> Thus forever postponing the ultimate measure of direct comprehension.
> 
>