Path: news.eternal-september.org!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertitaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity
Subject: Re: What is a photon
Date: Tue, 17 Jun 2025 22:28:38 +0000
Organization: Rocksolid Light
Message-ID: <94442da5bb2b262e5e50b00284f2758c@www.novabbs.org>
References: <9af3e95b721801ec23446e0d70f081b3@www.novabbs.org> <%5W_P.1199819$lZjd.237071@fx05.ams4> <101igg1$2gl1c$1@dont-email.me> <a4091b1928fa6740e56c17211f3a2d8e@www.novabbs.org> <102n38i$12jbf$1@dont-email.me> <a043322254d0e56377806ce06998ce6e@www.novabbs.org> <eaa42dca46900e6208a873f2770b6108@www.novabbs.org> <102sjh1$2k4lb$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="943913"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="8Ljlg8xw5cAHatvjdHGGjEHKUx9ddlqxMwQzk4UFm4k";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d6bc49351b0faa08a25d2b434d815198335a8b45
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$Nu7h18L5JA3Zq3609QhxKuiNri0EWtuQWYjnfcmxm1fcqRt./WcgK
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0

On Tue, 17 Jun 2025 20:41:41 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:

> Den 17.06.2025 01:35, skrev Bertitaylor:
>> On Mon, 16 Jun 2025 23:14:44 +0000, Bertitaylor wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 15 Jun 2025 18:33:24 +0000, Paul.B.Andersen wrote:
>>>
>>>>
>
>>>> The physics of Arindam Banerjee, employee of a medical research
>>>> laboratory, has discovered much new physics.
>
>> Wrong as always! Arindam never worked in medical research. Wonder where
>> you got that from and how low you racist and bigoted creeps will stoop
>> to demean and diminish the divine Arindam.
>
> https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=idsIuzEajTc
> At the very beginning of the video you can read:
>       Arindam Banerjee,
>     HTN Research Pty Ltd.
>        6 September 2022
>
> https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.bengali/c/mbbPlpsbbxk
> Quote:
> " Complete works in physics by Arindam Banerjee
>    Arindam Banerjee,
>     HTN Research Pty Ltd. Melbourne"
>
>     HTN stands for hypertension. Go figure.
>
> BTW, why do you think working in a medical research lab
> would "diminish the divine Arindam" ?
>
> So to his "physics":
>
>>>>
>>>> Complete works in physics by Arindam Banerjee:
>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/soc.culture.bengali/c/mbbPlpsbbxk
>>>>
>>>> "The cause of gravity":
>>>> https://groups.google.com/g/sci.physics/c/mmigkl3yZYc/m/8Rs16NCXAAAJ
>>>>
>>>> Quote of the first few statements:
>>>>   "The formula for universal gravitation is well known to be,
>>>>    as the force F acting between two masses m and M, parted by
>>>>    a distance r from their centres of mass, as F=GmM/r^2, where G
>>>>    is the gravitational constant found by experiment. Recently
>>>>    the author has updated this formula to F=BnN/r^2 where B is
>>>>    a constant, and n and N are the number of protons or electrons
>>>>    in the masses m and M. It is obvious that as n and N are proportional
>>>>    to m and M, this is essentially the same formula with the difference
>>>>    that instead of masses, the new formula involves charges. Thus the
>>>>    gravitational force is expressed electrostatically, as a
>>>> manifestation
>>>>    of electrostatic force. In other words, there is no difference
>>>> between
>>>>    electrostatic force and gravitational force."
>>>>
>>>> Do you, Bertitaylor, like Arindam, claim that the Sun is exerting
>>>> the electrostatic force 3.6e22 N on the Earth?
>
> The gravitational force between Earth and the Sun is 3.6e22 N.
>>
>> Ridiculous question seeing that there is gravitational attraction which
>> is really electrostatic.
>
> Maybe you should read it again?
>
> The Newtonian formula is F=GmM/r²   (1)
> Arindam's formula is:    F=BnN/r²   (2)
> Where:
>   B = G
>   n = number of protons and electrons in the mass m
>   N = number of protons and electrons in the mass M
>
> That means:
>    m = n⋅mₑ + n⋅mₚ     (3)
>    M = N⋅mₑ + N⋅mₚ     (4)
>   where mₑ is the mass of an electron and mₚ is the mass of a proton.


Rubbish. That is your idea which is not Arindam's.

Don't twist meanings to suit your nonsense.

The whole essay has to be read not just bits which are twisted.

Arindam DOES NOT TALK OF MASSES ATTRACTING. That is just Newtonian
thinking which is obsolete. He shows how masses attract when masses are
considered charges.

HE TALKS OF CHARGES ATTRACTING.

See the diagrams. There are no masses considered. Only charges.

Typical dishonesty, twisting, manipulating here by Einsteinian fraud.


>
> Inserting (3) and (4) in (2) yields:
>   F=BnN/r² ≡ BnN/r²
>
> So the two equations are identical!
>
> Since the number of protons and electrons in is the same,
> there is no net electric charge in m. Same with M.
>
> Do you really not understand that there is no electrostatic
> force between the two neutral masses m and M ?
>
> Do you still claim:
> "there is gravitational attraction which is really electrostatic"?
>
>>>>
>>>> "The Structure of Heavenly Bodies":
>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/sci.physics/8jH-SQIFFDo/O1jn3HpiBQAJ
>>>>
>>>> Quote about the pressure within the Earth:
>>>>   "F = G*m*D*pi*4*R/3
>>>>    Now when R or the radius of the Earth is zero, which is the case
>>>>    when the m is at the centre of the Earth, then F = 0. Now pressure
>>>>    is force per unit area, so pressure at the centre of the Earth is
>>>>    also zero."
>>>>
>>>> Do you, Bertitaylor, like Arindam, claim that the pressure at
>>>> the centre of the Earth is zero?
>>
>> Yes da oui si haaN hyaN bilkul zaroor ja with wohls on...
>
> Thanks for a clear answer.
> You, like Arindam believe that the pressure within the Earth
> is highest right below the surface and is diminishing with depth.
>
> The equation F = G*m*D*pi*4*R/3 is the gravitational force
> on a mass m when it is a distance R from the centre of the Earth.
>
> The gravitational force on the mass m at the surface is:
>   F = m⋅9.91953 N (we ignore the rotation of the Earth)
>
> Let's consider the following scenario:
> We have a 1000 m deep cylindrical hole in the surface of the Earth.
>
> The gravitational force on you standing at the bottom of the hole is:
>   F = m⋅9.91790 N
>
> If your mass is 80 kg, your weight will be 0.1244 N less at
> the bottom of the hole than on the surface.
>
> So the gravitational force diminish with depth.
>
> Now we fill the hole with water.
> The pressure at the surface is 1 atm = 1013.25 hPa
> The pressure on you is now 10020 kPa or ca 100 atm.
>
> The pressure increases with depth, as any scuba diver would tell you.
>
> How can you, like Arindam, fail to know this?
>
> If we fill the hole with stone with density 5563 kg/m³
> (the average density of the Earth),
> the pressure at the bottom of the hole becomes:
>   55275 kPa or 556 atm
>
> The pressure at the centre of the Earth is 360 Gpa
> 3.5 millions atm.
>
> Do you still not understand how idiotic Arindam is when he
> claim that the pressure at the centre of the Earth is zero?
>

--