| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<94d875d2c4c7a7d6331e267f08b10935@www.novabbs.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!eternal-september.org!feeder3.eternal-september.org!news.quux.org!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: clzb93ynxj@att.net (LaurenceClarkCrossen) Newsgroups: sci.physics.relativity Subject: Re: How did Einstein Develop his Field =?UTF-8?B?RXF1YXRpb25zPyAgV2hlbjog?= =?UTF-8?B?QS4gSGUgYWRtaXR0ZWQgaGF2aW5nIGxpdHRsZSBtYXRo?= Date: Thu, 2 Jan 2025 19:25:57 +0000 Organization: novaBBS Message-ID: <94d875d2c4c7a7d6331e267f08b10935@www.novabbs.com> References: <11ed9ce5561647a339178272953d5c1a@www.novabbs.com> <676bf17f$0$29726$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <27cc03a1ab0488bf362d322e32b4a4dd@www.novabbs.com> <67716585$0$12919$426a34cc@news.free.fr> <058de8e31bcf885d667d37be1d9badf7@www.novabbs.com> <6773a854$0$29719$426a74cc@news.free.fr> <4d257ac660b0a521c889d3d9175ef1c3@www.novabbs.com> <67766d86$0$406$426a74cc@news.free.fr> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Injection-Info: i2pn2.org; logging-data="1697870"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org"; posting-account="HcQFdl4zp4UQRQ9N18ivMn6Fl9V8n4SPkK4oZHLgYdQ"; User-Agent: Rocksolid Light X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0 X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$m5DeOe3RFv/NDAcfad5RceZLkUL8MzhFz7YI8yEmMVeUYyLyDE23u X-Rslight-Posting-User: a2f761a7401f13abeefca3440f16b2f27b708180 Bytes: 5007 Lines: 95 On Thu, 2 Jan 2025 10:42:14 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote: > LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote: > >> On Tue, 31 Dec 2024 8:16:21 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote: >> >>> rhertz <hertz778@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>> On Sun, 29 Dec 2024 15:06:47 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>>> >>>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> On Wed, 25 Dec 2024 11:50:23 +0000, J. J. Lodder wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> LaurenceClarkCrossen <clzb93ynxj@att.net> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> How did Einstein Develop his Field Equations? >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> When: >>>>>>>> A. He admitted having little math and no ability in non-Euclidean >>>>>>>> geometry. >>>>>>>> B. He always relied on someone else to do his math. >>>>>>>> C. He denied getting it from Hilbert. >>>>>>>> D. He never said who he got it from. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Answer: >>>>>>>> He stole them from Hilbert. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hilbert disagreed, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Jan >>>>>> Here are two other versions of the quote; >>>>>> >>>>>> "Every street boy in Gottingen knows as much elliptical geometry as >>>>>> Einstein. But the equations are his." >>>>>> >>>>>> "Every boy in the streets of Gottingen understands more about >>>>>> four-dimensional geometry than Einstein. Yet, in spite of that, Einstein >>>>>> did the work and not the mathematicians." — David Hilbert >>>>>> >>>>>> There is only one way to interpret this. That is Hilbert pointing out >>>>>> that obviously Einstein did not invent the field equations because he >>>>>> could not. >>>>> >>>>> That is your way, and it is obviously wrong. >>>>> Hilbert chides his fellow mathematicians, and hence himself, >>>>> for not having found the correct equation of general relativity, >>>>> despite their superior technical skills. >>>>> Hilbert goes on to state that: >>>>> In spite of that it was Einstein who got there. >>>>> >>>>> You may guess what Hilbert did next: (see the ref supplied by RH) >>>>> ==== >>>>> On December 4th, Hilbert even nominated Einstein for election as a >>>>> corresponding member of the Göttingen Mathematical Society. >>>>> (So to his own backyard, where all those superior Gottingen >>>>> mathematicians dwelt. It was the highest honour he could bestow >>>>> personally) >>>>> ==== >>>>> >>>>> Just what you would expect Hilbert to do, >>>>> if he considered Einstein an incompetent bungler >>>>> who had just stolen his results. >>>>> >>>>> You had better forget about all this. >>>>> You are wrong about it, period. >>>>> >>>>> Jan >>>> >>>> Stop talking idiocies, >>> >>> [snip abuse, and new irrelevancies] >>> >>> Do you deny that the text I quoted is in the reference you gave? >>> >>> Jan > >> Everyone can plainly understand Hilbert was pointing out that Einstein >> was not competent to have thought up the field equations. It is utterly >> deceitful to think otherwise. You are so deluded. > > Everyone who is not wearing your blinders can see what Hilbert said, > and what he intended. > He praised Einstein for having found the field equations, > despite his initial lack of the mathematical toolkit needed for it. > Einstein created and learned for himself whatever was needed. > > BTW, in a later note Hilbert expressed admiration, > and a bit of jealousy, at Einsten's ease and speed > in deriving the Mercury precession from the field equations. > "If only I could calculate like you..." > > Jan As usual, you are not the slightest bit persuasive. "...towards the end of his life Einstein admitted to: 'Having been an unscrupulous opportunist.'"- ibid p. 38.