Deutsch English Français Italiano |
<94qj4j19tspbrhv3pde0io5bllj00b69kj@4ax.com> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!news-out.netnews.com!postmaster.netnews.com!us12.netnews.com!not-for-mail X-Trace: DXC=Of:e>]\mG1Za9Q\kQUSJoQHWonT5<]0T]Q;nb^V>PUfV`L[ofA1LK4QcXmV`;<Mi@\FJZ7@I4Jm?R]_fHSAcb[OR4aJ4o0;e1RS4E2ZVSoJVY[_a3f0Ymho:P X-Complaints-To: support@blocknews.net From: Andrzej Matuch <andrzej@matu.ch> Newsgroups: comp.os.linux.advocacy Subject: Re: Another FOSS Gem Date: Sun, 19 May 2024 07:57:53 -0400 Message-ID: <94qj4j19tspbrhv3pde0io5bllj00b69kj@4ax.com> References: <17d05e981fe6d8d5$29125$542956$802601b3@news.usenetexpress.com> <v28pv7$2e0sb$1@dont-email.me> <6647f2ff$0$7053$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v2a8s2$2pqal$2@dont-email.me> <6648a71e$0$6438$882e4bbb@reader.netnews.com> <v2ccdn$39nup$1@dont-email.me> <6649e10a$0$2564$426a74cc@news.free.fr> User-Agent: ForteAgent/8.00.32.1272 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Lines: 55 NNTP-Posting-Host: 127.0.0.1 X-Trace: 1716119874 reader.netnews.com 7064 127.0.0.1:38067 Bytes: 3730 On 19 May 2024 11:22:50 GMT, Stéphane CARPENTIER <sc@fiat-linux.fr> wrote: >Le 19-05-2024, Sebastian <sebastian@here.com.invalid> a écrit : >> >> Red Hat is the main company in the Linux community insisting that everything >> has to change in order to make Linux "modern." > >They should start by providing up to date distros instead of obsolete by >design distros. Then I could start considering this claim seriously. > >> Systemd was from them, and >> they also have a hand in Wayland, and usrmerge was their idea. They also have >> radical ideas that haven't been forced on the entire Linux community (yet), >> such as read-only rootfs, and image-based updates. > >Their radical ideas haven't been forced on the entire Linux community. > >For a start, when Poettering came with the idea of systemd, Red Hat, his >employer at the time told him it was bad. And so Poettering did it on >his own time and came back to his employer with the working product. And >only at this time did Red Hat decided to use it. And the other distros >decided to use it because it was good. Ubuntu tried to remove SysVInit >with upstart and were happy to switch to systemd when it was possible. > >For the archlinux community, the reasons are listed there: ><https://www.reddit.com/r/archlinux/comments/4lzxs3/comment/d3rhxlc/?context=3> >It was not imposed by Read Hat it was a welcome change. > >So stop believing the crap displayed by FR/DG/NV/LP/whatever and learn >what you are talking. Systemd wasn't a Red Hat idea and systemd wasn't >forced on any distro, it was happily embraced by the distros. Thank you for this history lesson. >> They always export their radical ideas to all other distros, > >Nonsense. They never imposed anything. Other embraced their ideas or not >but there is no imposition. > >> and if this extends to small details like the availability of >> newsreaders, I'd expect to see them vanish from Debian and other >> distros before too long. > >Nonsense. Once again. There is no relation between a radical idea and >the availability of a newsreader in the list of packages. If there is no >more use for a package, nobody will want to take care of it and it will >be removed. It's just that simple. And as usenet is a dying media, there >will be less and less use for a newsreader. There is no such thing as >Red Hat telling other distros which packages they must manage and which >one they shouldn't. Usenet readers are likely of little interest to people nowadays who have not only become accustomed to censorship, but embraced it and the values stemming from it. I can't stand these people. Usenet 4 life.