| Deutsch English Français Italiano |
|
<96b8781159b3dc7f2f65dae62c89ffa0c8ef2fc4@i2pn2.org> View for Bookmarking (what is this?) Look up another Usenet article |
Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!news.nk.ca!rocksolid2!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Richard Damon <richard@damon-family.org>
Newsgroups: comp.theory
Subject: Re: Hypothetical possibilities -- I reread this again more carefully
Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 07:27:57 -0400
Organization: i2pn2 (i2pn.org)
Message-ID: <96b8781159b3dc7f2f65dae62c89ffa0c8ef2fc4@i2pn2.org>
References: <v7gl30$3j9fi$1@dont-email.me> <v7h1fl$3lcvq$3@dont-email.me>
<v7h224$3li66$3@dont-email.me>
<e975eef57ba6d3d4cc790818c05b7165443f7ce4@i2pn2.org>
<v7h5b2$3m6kq$2@dont-email.me>
<73e4850d3b48903cf85b2967ba713aced98caf96@i2pn2.org>
<v7h9on$3muu0$1@dont-email.me>
<09536cf44fc4c3d14b37641cf8fdc9e8a8c24580@i2pn2.org>
<v7hept$3o0be$1@dont-email.me>
<97884acd35091ddd67bda892c7a3dd28e188f760@i2pn2.org>
<v7hftt$3o7r5$1@dont-email.me>
<f74209ef7d87b6f7891e4a2b89cc18bfe7233810@i2pn2.org>
<v7hkb2$3otgn$1@dont-email.me>
<1c5729ae6d0a7bca84d24eec9f85bf30de70e3d9@i2pn2.org>
<v7hnu6$3pd9s$1@dont-email.me>
<f0dda3e0d0e85081d8ce0cdd494f5f1f8f8c89e3@i2pn2.org>
<v7huen$3u1jc$3@dont-email.me>
<6883b0a9674975998092c404f9eaa331ad1556b9@i2pn2.org>
<v7i20r$3ucnd$1@dont-email.me>
<8e0bcb6d7508f8334460e30557d444abc5356a03@i2pn2.org>
<v7kocc$gi50$1@dont-email.me>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Date: Mon, 22 Jul 2024 11:27:58 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
logging-data="4156305"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
posting-account="diqKR1lalukngNWEqoq9/uFtbkm5U+w3w6FQ0yesrXg";
User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird
In-Reply-To: <v7kocc$gi50$1@dont-email.me>
Content-Language: en-US
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
Bytes: 3244
Lines: 47
On 7/22/24 12:49 AM, olcott wrote:
> On 7/21/2024 6:37 AM, Richard Damon wrote:
>> On 7/21/24 12:15 AM, olcott wrote:
>>> On 7/20/2024 10:51 PM, Richard Damon wrote:
>>>>
>>>> No, the SIMULA*TION* stops running, the SIMULATED (which is the
>>>> actual program) behaviof continues.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Yes you are clueless.
>>>
>>> void DDD()
>>> {
>>> HHH(DDD);
>>> return;
>>> }
>>>
>>> When the simulation stops running the whole program
>>> exits to the operating system.
>>
>>
>> Which just shows you don't understand the MEANING of the behavior of a
>> program.
>>
>> Behvior is the UNCHANING attribute of what the program does when it is
>> run. As such, aborting a simulation of it doesn't stop behavior.
>>
>
> *You are still totally clueless*
>
> As soon as HHH(DDD) aborts its simulation HHH immediately
> exits to the operating system.
>
No it return to its caller, or it isn't a decider.
You are just showing how clueless you are.
Turing Machines do not HAVE an "operating system" to return to.d
All you are doing is proving how totally ignorant you are of the field
you claim to be making groundbreaking discoveries in, which just show
you to be a pathological lying idiot with a reckless disregard for the
truth.
Face it, you are just showing how much you have wasted your life by
beleiving the lies you told yourself because you couldn't face the
actual Truth.