Path: ...!weretis.net!feeder9.news.weretis.net!i2pn.org!i2pn2.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: bertietaylor@myyahoo.com (Bertietaylor)
Newsgroups: sci.physics
Subject: Re: do you believe we can quantize =?UTF-8?B?Z3Jhdml0eT8=?=
Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 21:42:56 +0000
Organization: novaBBS
Message-ID: <96c8579ab960aa5997554af4cd2c3f7e@www.novabbs.com>
References: <j9oiptyjxgxi$.dlg@tomato.potato> <sbirtk-56q42.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <eaf2af09821e0f3c4e780f09cfb742fd@www.novabbs.com> <02cff57f49c5b9f6ef0d33441951cb1e@www.novabbs.com> <lqsstk-85j62.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <678b32e2a0eba553fdcf24b9489cc5d5@www.novabbs.com> <aflttk-b2682.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <06a143affa77a528480f8fb55f650787@www.novabbs.com> <o0gvtk-5gba2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net> <171469a06dcc0b480244123ef80cb6c7@www.novabbs.com> <76c0uk-4rvb2.ln1@gonzo.specsol.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Injection-Info: i2pn2.org;
	logging-data="2058764"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@i2pn2.org";
	posting-account="4CIDjmRjWbqC4EEN5EcU+HA+pIaOwwy51Z63DnRPIoA";
User-Agent: Rocksolid Light
X-Rslight-Posting-User: d1111375bdddd1d0b42e6fbe96c9934b24d8a010
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 4.0.0
X-Rslight-Site: $2y$10$bQAr30JeVwUeAjVGJ1xfHuSGtVA4gPVkbR7adqqpgd8Mgb8hOz8nW
Bytes: 4289
Lines: 82

On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 20:40:09 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:

> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>> On Mon, 14 Oct 2024 12:39:22 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>
>>> Bertietaylor <bertietaylor@myyahoo.com> wrote:
>>>> On Sun, 13 Oct 2024 20:00:12 +0000, Jim Pennino wrote:
>>>>
>>>
>>> <snip old crap>
>>>
>>>>> Having watched your videos I have to ask, what is it that you think is
>>>>> new in YOUR railgun in one sentence? Where is your math that shows it is
>>>>> anything new?
>>>>
>>>> Heavy armature, very low voltage, very light weight.
>>>
>>> Nothing new there whatsoever.
>>
>> Keep on lying.
>>>
>>>> It is a new design
>>>> rail gun which proved Arindam's thesis that it has no reaction by easily
>>>> reproducible experiment. Which is the greatest science discovery of our
>>>> time.
>>>
>>> Yet you have no details, no instrumentation, no data and no analysis
>>> with error bars that prove anything.  Just crackpot ravings.
>>
>> Keep on lying. What better to expect from racist bigots!
>
> Does your railgun have two parallel conductors connected to a DC power
> source?
>
> Yes, nothing new there.

Did any other railgun design work in this manner?
Did any previous railgun design have manually portable low weight, low
voltage, and very heavy armature?

NO
 This PARTICULAR railgun ***design*** IS A NEW INVENTION.

Arindam does not claim to have designed the railgun. That was done long
ago and had and has very many limitations. Also used for war. Existing
designs are very heavy, use very small bullets,need very high voltages,
cause damage to rails. Also very expensive with power consumption and
maintenance.

Arindam claims a new design that is revolutionary and can be used as a
gun, a engineering tool for mining and tunneling, launching heavy
satellites, air defence on one hand in gun mode and in motor mode with
arrested armature act as a reaction less engine for faster than light
travel in due course. It will change air travel when replacing jet
engines. Go slowly up to space without rockets and glide gently back
reaching hypersonic speeds in near space.

Instead of supporting Arindam the corrupt and stupid world admirably
represented by Penisnino here mocks and ignores him.

What fools these apes be!

Woof-woof

Bertietaylor (Arindam's celestial cyberdogs)


>
> Does your railgun have a conductive armateur across the rails?
>
> Yes, nothing new there.
>
> Do you have any measurements that show your railgun does not follow the
> same equations of all other railguns since 1917?
>
> No, nothing new there.
>
> Size, weight, and power supply size are irrelevant as railguns have been
> built using paper clips and a joule or so of energy to megajoule guns.
>
> You have no data, no analysis, no math and nothing new, crackpot.
>
> In one sentence, what is new about your railgun, crackpot?